English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

On 60 minutes just now, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad just said: "Those that don't accept good will have a bad fate."

That is an extremely open ended statement. I seriously don't think that his idea of good matches my idea of good. Is anyone else worried that this religious crazed man (who interrupted his interview for prayer) now has Uranium to play with?

2006-08-13 12:36:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I agree Bush is no wizard. But he isn't implying that those that don't believe in his lord will have a "bad fate".

2006-08-13 12:44:09 · update #1

Look we all know Bush is no genius (far from it), but stop skirting the issue, Bush still is on the side of democracy. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is on the side that is for the demise of those that don't believe in his lord. Do you really trust him with Uranium? Bush has had Plutonium since day one, but have you ever worried about that dunce actually using it? I don't feel that comfort with Ahmadinejad!!!

2006-08-13 12:50:27 · update #2

Wow, assasination eh? He is a very bright guy, would you rather reason with a bright guy or his successor?

2006-08-13 12:53:21 · update #3

Wow, Mr. Mister, I need more info!!! (please)

2006-08-13 12:56:30 · update #4

12 answers

Ahmadinejad tells Wallace one thing, and Iran another ...

2006-08-13 23:11:51 · answer #1 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 0 0

i'm neither iranian nor muslim yet so a options as i heard, the killer is a russian-german, he have a germany passport and that qualifies him as german. as for the president of iran, i imagine he's merely voicing his concerns on the region of a pregnant muslim woman being killed in a court docket room. i in my opinion do not even recognize how someone will be allowed in a court docket room with a knife. human beings have rights and that is an similar reason at the same time as the iranian regime beaten the protesters, the international have aired their concerns and germany replaced into no exception. i heavily do not provide a crap about the iranian president cos i'm no longer iranian nor from the boastful western powers who had themes with iran for a lengthy time period yet i merely imagine from time to time the international want to be searching in any respect area..with the help of ways, replaced into it in straightforward words the iranian president who voiced his situation about the killing? in the different case why unmarried him out? to be problem-free, the iranian president attacking germany for the killing of an egyptian pregnant woman isn't something except yet another political pork that existed between the west and iran for decades.

2016-11-24 23:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The president of Iran, as well as the other Iranian leaders are not playing with a full deck. I could blame their religion on it, but I think even without Islam they would be in the Hitler category. He is the one that I expect will have the bad fate, if not in this life, then in the here after. Good thing he is not an American citizen for if put on trial, he would get off, for he really has no idea of right and wrong.

2006-08-13 12:49:19 · answer #3 · answered by Taiping 7 · 1 0

Why don't you read what this clown said about August 22 2006.

You have not heard 1/10th of what this crazed jerk has said and promised to do.

He has millions and millions of Muslims begging him to Nuke Israel August 22. It is a very real chance he may do it.
He claims, Allah has chosen him to bring the world to final war.

NO. Iran is no threat to the USA. BUT.........

When Iran nukes Israel, USA will make a landfill for Egypt, then Russia and China will come in. helloooooo?

God or no God.......

You think all of this is mere coincidence?

2006-08-13 12:54:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is one neutron short of a synapse. I took his statement as a veiled threat, and would like to see him removed by any means necessary. It always worries me when nukes are in the hands of nut jobs that equate death to martyrdom.

2006-08-13 13:01:56 · answer #5 · answered by Battlerattle06 6 · 1 0

I worry about Bush's sanity. The president of Iran is a college professor. Bush probably had a hard time passing fingerpainting at his pre-nursery class.

Bush is controlled by Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rice and the Israeli lobby. He needed courts to be elected in 2000. We've had nothing but terrorism and disaster since. Iran has a right to have nuclear weapons just as Israel and just as the US and anyone else.

2006-08-13 12:41:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Of course I'm worried. He's currently giving loads of weapons to Hezbollah. He is seriously stuffed up in da head. He hates Israel and either they or the US are gonna invade him soon enough.

2006-08-13 12:49:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think you might need to listen more carefully to president Bush. He is just as big a religious whack job as the other guy.

2006-08-13 12:46:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes I am very worried. Iran hates us! We are not Shiites and are considered infidels.

2006-08-13 12:40:49 · answer #9 · answered by jesus_lover1962 3 · 1 1

I am very worried about the American president's sanity - and he has control of WMDs.

2006-08-13 12:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by ceprn 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers