ok i asked the question before and got some intersting and funny answers including the every 28 days they will be a world war joke but who do u honestly belive is better running the world the women or the men and if u pick the women what exactly will be different and don't just say world wars
2006-08-13 08:49:45 · 5 answers · asked by ? 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
All the hiking trails in the National Park/Forest Services would be paved and perfectly level.
Lady Liberty would get a makeover on Oprah.
Take You Daughter to Work Day would become a national holiday. Then, most of the workforce would have that day off, thus defeating that day's purpose. (Hmmm, that's a good idea)
The colors of "Old Glory" would be changed to Fuchsia, Mother of Pearl, and Cobalt.
All elevator music would be Celine Dion.
Wars would break out if two lady head's of state wore the same dress to a political function.
Este Lauder would provide camouflage face paint for the Armed Forces, in a multitude of fabulous colors.
2006-08-13 09:21:10 · answer #1 · answered by Mike R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well. This is a very interesting question. Its also in the completely wrong category but I'll overlook that. I'm a girl so i'm inclined to say that women would be better. But we are more emotional..less rational. We think with our heart first. We have a lot more compassion. So even if we got our chance to run things (we never will) there would be no wars. You're right. But we have to face the truth as women. Unless we put all men underground and use them for breeding stock only..we'll never get a chance to rule. Its a patriarchal world. Always will be.
2006-08-13 08:55:44 · answer #2 · answered by mlove1307 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This could only work if all of the girls were also lesbians or bisexual.
Like Ancient Greek society, being pinned together by homosexual relationships between men, women would probably only stop being so catty to each other if they were also having sex with each other. (I don't have experience with this first hand, seeing as I've never seen a large group of lesbians interact for a long period of time), but in theory, it seems to make sense. Then there would just be jealous-lover spats. :)
Mostly girls seem to not get along because we all view each other as competition for male attention. I don't think this dynamic would change much, whether or not women were in the top position...we'd still fight for male attention, but we'd fight for it like men fight for female attention...well, less cat fights, I suppose.
And maybe girls can only rule the world once they stop acting like that.
As for the wars? Doubt it. Women have historically been the ones trying to keep civilization together while the men...simultaneously create it, and tear it apart. Women are like civilization's glue.
Maybe it's time that women start coming up with the ideas, and stop trying to hold together the broken pieces...
2006-08-13 09:08:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If women folk ruled the international, it would be a happier and greater non violent place. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, women folk are inept to take administration of one of those capability, so society does not function as nicely as whilst men rule the international. i am going with peace, so I chosen the girls to rule the international...time to coach historic previous around.
2016-12-11 08:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
god would probably be pissed and flood the world again....killing hillary clinton first
2006-08-13 08:56:24 · answer #5 · answered by drew t 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋