How did you prove point with confusing statutes?
2006-08-13 06:22:41 · 4 answers · asked by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 in Business & Finance ➔ Credit
Check out the site I've listed.
The statutes you need to prove credit cards are not considered written contracts are listed.
You might also look through the naca site for an attorney www.naca.net
hmmmm, I guess I'm repeating myself from 4 weeks ago.
psssst Studly - wrong state bud.
2006-08-13 08:50:12 · answer #1 · answered by echo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What exactly are you trying to prove?
Below lists the Montana laws regarding this.
27.2.202 clearly defines the time limit of unwritten contracts at 5 years.
As for the starting period, 27.2.102 is a little vague. it only says that the SOL begins "when a claim or cause of action accures".
Remembe how in past responses I've stated that it's a "gray" area about what the "last transaction" is? This is a good example. But as I read it, the action "accures" once you have made a purchase.
...but I'm not a lawyer.
2006-08-13 17:34:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Statue of limitations does apply. They can't keep coming after forever. The statute of limitations starts 30 days after your are late. Some public libraries or your state public library may be able to look at the statue of limitations for you. You will need to go to the library.
2006-08-13 13:58:03 · answer #3 · answered by webworm90 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Statue of limitations only kicks in if the Credit Card company has not been trying to collect from you over the period of limitation. Remember also that the court can extend the period.
2006-08-13 13:29:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋