I think america should hand over their nukes to iran, they need it more to help with energy!! what do u think?

Question

yes i think america shold give up their nukes to iran..period!! iran deserves it....america dont need it....screw the americans....iran needs to help with their energy crisis....its essential iran gets nukes....so wat if they wana nuke america....who the hell.doesnt man....if they wana nuke america lets let them.....personally i think america should consider giving up its nukes to iran....havent u heard about the iranian energy crisis....r u ppl blind?? dumb american fatties...i think bush planned 9/11 and the recent terror thing...i they need an excuse for oil.....

ps...who do u think will win in a fist fight between bush and bin laden....personally bin laden will win cause he is 6'6...but bush might use a low blow and use some dirty tactics but overall bin laden might just pip bush.....bush is an angry terrior...but bin laden will use his turban and his long beard to choke bush....

Answer 1

The only reason to give Iran the nukes is to blow them up. Since that is not the best thing to do, I see no reason to give Iran anything.... and yes I believe that the American government planned 9/11 to get their agenda passed..... it's unfortunate that the government will do anything to get their agenda done at the expense of innocent people...

Answer 2

It is a good idea to hand over American nuke to Iran. But who can make sure it will used only for energy purposes? Iran , with a theocratic government, this nuke can end up in the hands of real terrorists, thus it will be passed to Afgan and Pak terrorists , they would use it blow thier enemies , especially Pak will use it against India. It is not safe in the hands of people who like to die and take other people along with them.

Answer 3

Still on the nukes glen? Getting old...

You have the right idea though. Maybe someone should give Iran a few of them. How about from 50,000 feet?

Answer 4

That has got to be the stupidest answer in the world (I meant what was written under the original question). You're talking about nuclear weapons, If Iran were to get one of them they could destroy one of America's major city. So imagine if we handed over all of ours we would probably all be dead. They can use other means for energy, like solar energy. I meant what was written under the original question

Answer 5

I agree. We should fly a few over now. In fact, the missiles can fly themselves over. But you should be some where else when they land. Do you know what happens when sand reaches 2000 degrees in 2 seconds? Glass!! A whole country under glass. You could see that from the moon.

Answer 6

It relies upon in case you mean nuking united statesa. via fact the rustic of Iran, formally attacking the US or giving a nuke to Al Queda and having them placed it right into a shipment field and deliver it to long sea coast or the Port of latest york. the two way, it may well be stupid. a million. no rely if it is accomplished in retaliation for an attack, the US will comprehend what u . s . to tutor into radioactive glass. 2. no rely if it is surpassed over to Al Queda and used, you are able to undergo in techniques that each and each radioactive isotope has a signature, a finger print in case you will. very with out postpone it is going to likely be found the place the bomb became produced (N.Korea or Iran) and for that consequence see merchandise a million. 3. If (or whilst) they get the bomb, they'd be greater useful served to no longer waste the only shot they have of their little cap pistol. it may well be far greater helpful for sabre damn and impressing the surely inspired people interior the area. 4. in the event that they have been stupid adequate available a style of nukes to Al Queda, Israel would in all probability bomb them in a pre-emptive strike the 2d they heard approximately it. Their u . s . would be flattened and it might take months to produce yet another warhead. So, no. Iran does no longer use a nuke in the event that they could be able to make one. in spite of the fact that if we've been to invade them and defeat their military, they does no longer decide for to allow THAT tiger out of the gage. no longer till they want to perish as a race. to respond to the question you asked on the tip, if I have been president of Iran, i'd marvel the worldwide and halt the conflict interior the middle East by utilising embracing Israel. i'd invite the US and Israel to hook up with me in "leaning on" Syria and the different u . s . it is offering troops, bombs, bullets or beans to the insurgents. i'd double my u . s .'s properly-known of residing by utilising cooperating with the west, who would surely make it "properly worth at a similar time as" to my countrymen. i'd nevertheless proceed try to alter into "precise canine" interior the section, yet i'd do it as a buddy of peace and humanity. i'd comprehend that the worldwide feeds itself with oil. If the worldwide shows a clean source (and that they are working no longer person-friendly on doing basically that) i'd comprehend that if we are too problematic to handle, the worldwide will take its business enterprise someplace else.

Answer 7

1, where are you from? 2, If we gave them nukes, considering they've already threatened to bomb us, the outcome wouldn't be good. 3, You sound like a liberal. 4, Next time you have a thought about americans, let it go...

Answer 8

Sure let me send some over now, I just have to find the right button.

Answer 9

Sure give them the tools to destroy themselves. That's just what they will do.

Answer 10

I agree long as we send them via b1 bombers