your dog killed my dog .. your son killed my son .. what is the difference between the two situations ..?

Question

because we have a religion , two situations are not the same ..
if there were not any religions .. then the two situation would be same ..what do you think ..

Answer 1

i see where you're going, but i think it's more complex than that.

Answer 2

Why would you want to consider yourself to be at the level of a dog, if your father would ask this question?

The difference between a human being and a dog is human beings have the sense of giving voluntarily which a dog may seldom have, except for those it is loyal to. If you see a homeless man who is needing food, chances are most human beings (religious or non-religious) would have the urge to feed the man, with very few exceptions. Some may implement that urge more immediately while others may procastrinate or suppress it and forget it. But, chances are most will feel that urge.

If a dog saw another dog that needed food, first of all the chances are the dog may not even notice the hunger of the other dog. Plus, it may not even occur to it to share what it has. In fact, if the hungry dog would want to partake of the meal in the presence of the full dog, he will probably not allow the other dog to eat from his left overs and fight him.

Religions manage to get these deep feelings we intrinsically have into organized systems that allow us to serve mankind in a systematic manner.

Killing is never the answer to any issue. Dialogue is the better answer or if worse comes to worse agreeing to disagree.

That said, if someone physically attacks you, the good people should do their best to punish the aggressors. Dont you think.

Then again a dog will never do that. It would quietly accept that might is right. A good religious person can never bear with that thought and it will gnaw on his soul to allow an evil man to take control and rule over his companions, family and himself.

At least I hope so.

Answer 3

that is not any longer your canines, that is lack of teaching and someone (maximum possibly the youngsters) are stressful the canines once you aren't any further round and that is had sufficient. The canines also appears like that is not socilized to have interplay with different dogs and that i'm guessing it infrequently receives a walk on a leash because he has the "freedom" of a back backyard. That back backyard is his territory and he will decide on who he facilitates back there. So your children associates more effective than possibly will be denied with the aid of the canines... Now.. with that stated.. you've an aggressive canines it is risky in spite of ways massive it is. so that you've 2 alternatives... in case you may't have sufficient money education and also you're definitely worried about conserving the canines, please contact an area rescue team and ask them to discover the canines a sparkling residing house or positioned up an ad on Craigslist. in case you want to do the right component, spend an hour an afternoon education the canines with your children and at the same time practice your children to take care of the canines with appreciate. and do not enable the canines roam loose anymore. whenever you're taking it outdoors, even if its your back backyard, positioned it on a leash to regulate the canines. in my opinion, i ought to discover the canines an proprietor who can administration and practice it proper.

Answer 4

There is a world of difference, in the human form of life, we possess free will to make a conscious choice to either control and regulate ourselves or behave on the same platform as an animal. An animal cannot regulate itself, a dog will never say "how can I control this barking habit"? So due to possessing the human form of life, more is expected of us, otherwise there is every chance to inherit the body of a dog if human free will is mis-used. This is Sanatana dharma?real wisdom without blind religious dogma.

For further discussion:-Sriman Sankarshan Das Adhikari ([e-mail])

Answer 5

Follow the money.

Anytime you see groups of people killing each other on a regular basis, follow the money and you will find the reason.

The killers (and killed) are morons, the financiers are instigating them to do so to gain even more wealth.


Animals do not routinely kill each other for sport or profit. They only do so when forced to do so in self defense or survival, or, as the result of being trained by humans to do so.

Answer 6

No because a human has not got a natural instinct to harm others. If a dog is not trained properly it will not know that killing another dog is wrong.

Answer 7

What is the difference? The son was an accident in the first place.

Answer 8

In the first one 2 dogs should die
In the second one 2 people should die

Do you think a person and dog are the same?

Oh I get it your a LIBERAL I understand

Answer 9

well that shows how educated,civilised people are who call others uncivilised barbarians.

well as for religion being the main cause of wars, no

there are many reasons too:
power
land
oil
woman
revenge
jelousy
tyranny

man will always find a reason to fight anyways. its not new. it all started from cain and will end by armageddon

Answer 10

what has religion got to do with this ? i am trying to find out. soon after i find out i will answer your question. i am a dog lover. still i cannot treat my dog & my son same way. so, i am still wondering about this question.

Answer 11

animals don't kill for the fun of it, men (and women) do. religion is the most common reason for killing. get rid of religion and the incentive for killing will definitely be less.