U.S.A. @ AD 2006
And yes, we are due to pray for our leaders and for the soldiers who fight under our flag. I don't think you got it straight, you seem a little biased. But you know what, I love you anyway. I'll put you on my list and add you to my world. (Do you want to come with me to Jerusalem ? .... I plan to do that trip one day.)
Now, please tell me your name and give me the 10 points.
LOL
2006-08-13 01:15:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by mirela t 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not agree with the line up, so I would have to say I would be on the third side of this one...remember that one man's freedom fighter is another man's terorist. George Washington was considered a terrorist by the British, Americans considered Tarlton a terrorist, Mohammed was a theif and murdered from the point of view of the people he had killed, Lincoln suspended Constitutional liberties to some degree, the USA rebuilt Europe and Japan and has historically been considered an experiment in liberty and democratic government-but has a history of denying rights to certain people and having an arrogant foreign policy...so it's a mixed bag. I'll work the burger stand at this.
2006-08-12 17:57:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) Which Pharaoh??? There were lots. And anyways, the Egyptians never went to war with anyone (except maybe Nubia, but that doesn't really count).
2) Attila the Hun wasn't nearly as bad as his reputation.
3) Does "cherch" mean Winston Churchill? In this case, WTF?!?!
4) Your bad spelling/grammar is a disgrace.
2006-08-12 17:54:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Although I agree with some of the people from list 1 and none from list 2....I choose not to pick sides.
2006-08-12 17:49:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by laetusatheos 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know about any of the others, what exactly you're going for here...but I'm on the side of the us army. Those guys don't get to pick their battles. And they're out there giving their lives so you have the freedom to ask such dumb questions.
2006-08-12 18:01:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥Mira♥ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say the first one, I'm a Christian, but I love the methods of Ghandi, and I've studied some of Muhammed, and I'm impressed. These are people that worked for the good of their people.
2006-08-12 17:49:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by blessed_11706 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of it replaced into any ones fault. i think of Kate replaced into controlling and demeaning at situations to Jon, yet as a lot of human beings understand, childrens and marriage can deliver various tension to a marriage. So, they have been on over load. they are very youthful to have such various toddlers, they in fact have been given pregnant suitable whilst they have been given married, with the twins, then bam, catapulted into elevating 8 toddlers. i think of it replaced into tension from each and every day life that broke the marriage down. He in all threat did no longer experience like a guy anymore the way she could continuously order him around, communicate over him, maximum dazzling him, and he have been given ill of it and began to resent her for it.
2016-12-17 09:55:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm on the Lord's side and for each of these God created, knew their actions, and the Lord died on the cross for every man even Hitler.
2006-08-12 17:55:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by 4me2no&u2findout 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The question was asked of Michael the archangel in the bible, Who do you stand for? Whose side are you on?
His reply was:
I stand for God.
That is the side I am on.
2006-08-12 20:16:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by ManoGod 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
People do really stupid things in the name of God. But hey, if you're into stupid things, by all means, be religious.
2006-08-12 17:49:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋