Athaists--here is a new refine and solids proof of Holy Trinity. Dare refute it??

Question

* We start with

− 1 = − 1

* Then we convert these into vulgar fractions

\frac{1}{-1} = \frac{-1}{1}

* Applying square roots on both sides gives

\sqrt{\frac{1}{-1}} = \sqrt{\frac{-1}{1}}

* Which is equal to

\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{-1}} = \frac{\sqrt{-1}}{\sqrt{1}}

* If we now clear fractions by multiplying both sides by \sqrt{-1} and then \sqrt{1}, we have

\sqrt{1}\sqrt{1} = \sqrt{-1}\sqrt{-1}

* But any number's square root squared gives the original number, so

1 = − 1

theirfor, 1+1=0
or,2=0
or,2+1=0+1
theirfor,
3=1
theirfor, holy trinity is proofed. Quesa Errada Demostratum.

Answer 1

that is cool amen!!!! I like to see young ppl using their brain and chalening those who don't have a clue way to go keep up th egood work I hope God helps you to go far in life but it all ready looks like you got a good start!!!!! praise Jesus!!!!!!

Answer 2

How does 1 + 1=0?
And how does all this garbled maths 'prove' the Trinity? If the square root of a number squared gives the original number, how does 1=0?
What does that have to do with 'proof' of the Trinity?

You are a disgrace to Christianity, you racist buffoon. You seem to believe that only white Christians ever invented anything, and that also means that non Christians are not allowed to benefit from those inventions.
There is not a shred of compassion, not an ounce of love in your entire soul. You are full of spite and despise Muslims.

You are not posting questions. You are posting rants. Put some clothes on, put your fists down and go and do something constructive with your sorry life.

Answer 3

My dad is working on a similar theory. According to his math, no number is limited to the amount it describes. With similar theories, I could prove that the number 666=1=3. But I will not. I'm Christian and smart and I think that 1=3 means nothing at all relating to religion.

Answer 4

This step is incorrect: 5^2 - 5 instances 9 + frac{eighty one}{4} = 4^2 - 4 instances 9 + frac{eighty one}{4} * Now factor the two components back left(5 - frac{9}{2}superb suited)^2 = left(4 - frac{9}{2}superb suited)^2 there are actually not any hardship-unfastened components. 2(x ? y) = x ? y * Divide out (x ? y) yet you defined x=y. So x-y =0 with the aid of your definition. so which you assert that 0=0=2*0 Wow. pass back to midsection college, your math skills are lacking. QED.

Answer 5

Your body has a soul and spirit but you are still one person! Not 3 different people! A married man with a son for example his wife calls him husband and his son calls him father He is still one person! The father son and holy spirit is all the same person! God never appeared as Son of David and Son of Man at the same time! Put down the math book and read you bible!

Answer 6

Dear Christian Soldier... I STILL Don't get it. Even if we accept that 0=3, or, 1, or whatever, how does this prove the existance of the Holy Trinity? It just seems like saying,
"Since we can prove that 2x2=4,
we must therefore accept that the 4 Gospels are true"

I don't get it, please explain?

Answer 7

1. Your logic is nonexistent.

2. Your mathematics is flawed -- while you are right that when you square sqrt(-1) you get (-1) -- you forget that you are also dividing by (-1) and any number divided by itself is (1).

3. QED is an abbreviation for "quod erat demonstrandum."

Answer 8

I have an equation V=my fist punching you in the face so many times you beg for a left

Answer 9

Now what explains the fact that except for therefore, proved and "Quod Erat Demonstrandum," your spelling and grammar are impeccable?

Answer 10

God said you shall not partner me. Saying Jesus is God is implying God was human, therefore God is not infallable. The trinity also implies that God is dependant on 3 to exist. Jesus, Holy Spirit & God. Thats false.

oh is this a joke? ok i guess i fell for this.. lol

Answer 11

Thank you good man for showing me the errors of my ways.
I hope the Lord will forgive me too.


Laughing out loud!