They both seem to take disparate facts, and bundle them together in a very illogical way. Because of this, to me, they seem rather similar. What about you?
2006-08-12 11:59:45 · 9 answers · asked by acgsk 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There are extremists in every group. I understand where you are getting your comparisons though. Some of your extreme conspiracy theorists are also your misunderstood religious whack-jobs. They both are very adept into taking an array of unrelated facts and turn them into something completely different and then represent it as a factual conclusion to something completely unrelated. The scary thing is that both groups seem to be able to recruit more people to them and their causes.
2006-08-12 12:06:01 · answer #1 · answered by tjjone 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The funny thing is, is that there any many facts that back up many things that are in the Bible. History has proven many of the stories in the Bilbe and people in the Bible were very real. Jesus himself is not only writen about in the Bible but historical documents form the Roman government proved that a man anmed Jesus did live and was put to death. Polit the govenor over Israel did keep records of those put to death and those records do exist. But not just that, there were other historians of the day that wrote of Jesus' existance. So the Bilbe is historically right about events.
Weather you choose to believe anything else in the Bilbe is a question of faith. You alone are the only one that can do that, if you choose not to, then so what. If I choose to, whats the big deal?
History can back up so many things written about in the Bible, Conspiracy theorists don't have that.
2006-08-12 12:24:17 · answer #2 · answered by Dead Man Walking 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i'm no longer a guy of non secular convictions, in spite of the undeniable fact that, each and every faith claims that in hardship-free words the Divine will comprehend at the same time as the proper will take position. And if it is authentic, then ALL doomsayers try to foretell that which in hardship-free words the Divine can comprehend. So applaud those idiots for attempting to stave off the proper with the aid of affirming they "comprehend" at the same time as the proper will take position, because they are making certain that the international will proceed to spin (in case you believe in that variety of component). i desire this helps. good success.
2016-11-30 00:09:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no real difference. Religous nuts are just more annoying because the think they have a divine manadate to spread their BS so they never shut up about it.
2006-08-12 12:10:33 · answer #4 · answered by Jmanfan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are like kids. I think it is more possible that Kennedy's head exploded (conspiracy theory), than Jesus died, came back, and sits on a cloud. Religion is a conspiracy.
2006-08-12 12:19:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some of them...
2006-08-12 12:04:41 · answer #6 · answered by Indigo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow--THAT is quite a theory...and laced with religious bigotry...
2006-08-12 12:07:42 · answer #7 · answered by quilt-babe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sounds like atheists to me...i guess it depends on your perspective...
2006-08-12 12:04:22 · answer #8 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if you are an Atheist.
2006-08-12 12:02:54 · answer #9 · answered by Lives7 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋