English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

hehe.. Guess what anchor babies, if you or your parents came here after 1986 to have you to be a U.S. citizen while they were here on either a

1) Visa
2) Business
3) Student
4) Embassy Personnel

you are not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" and will be deported.

Law experts are working on this matter right now and is paying it's way thru the system to fish out those deemed "anchor" babies.

If you are an anchor baby after 1986, you are not a citizen. If your parents were not citizens before 1986 and you were born here, you and they are not citizens.

You will soon be deported, and be forced to pay back all funds that you collected from government funded programs. And if you or your family cannot pay up, you will work off your debt in a prison.

What do you think about that?

I'm loving it!! And can't wait for it to start!!

--Rob :)

Here is another article on it by the "Judicial Watch Blog," followed by a few comments....

http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2006/07/billion_dollar_anchor_babies.html

2006-08-12 10:59:41 · 6 answers · asked by stealth_n700ms 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

Pancha, in your dreams.. That page says nothing referring to 'anchor babies.'

2006-08-12 11:13:58 · update #1

6 answers

Going away party soon.

2006-08-12 11:03:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

outline "smart". i imagine the U. S. has very smart gun administration guidelines. All they favor to do is implement the guidelines. A gun isn't some other thing effective than a device, clone of a hammer, baseball bat, tire iron, or kitchen knife. contained in the fingers of to blame, regulation abiding voters (it is about ninety 9.9% of gun vendors), it is a really helpful device for protecting your self and your relations from damage. yet, compared to all the different approaches accessible, human beings bounce on the guns as a difficulty at the same time as the 0.a million% of gun vendors are irresponsible, even if it is leaving them out the position children can arise with them, or making use of them for a mass capturing someplace (which in case you ever be conscious, is under no circumstances finished everywhere yet a "gun-loose zone"). If someone become to take a baseball bat to an person-friendly college and commence bashing the heads of 1st graders, human beings will communicate about what's misguided with that human being, and to help different like him get the remedy they favor to steer away from such tragedy. yet when he is going in with a gun and shoots the youngsters particularly, that is the guns that are to blame, and human beings opt to prohibit guns to shop this from taking position back. *EDIT* - ignore about Daniel. He thinks that the authorities will take care of you from each and every of the undesirable adult men accessible, and in case you call "outing" the undesirable adult men might want to offer up and watch for the police to seem.

2016-11-30 00:07:45 · answer #2 · answered by baltazar 3 · 0 0

Yes, I read that too ... and not a day too soon ... I mean, what the heck do people think "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means? And I don't only mean the anchor babies themselves, but the dratted authorities who issued them with a birth certificate ...

2006-08-12 11:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by Sashie 6 · 1 1

Sorry ,Rob. Your wrong. Here's a link for you.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/immigration/#
Yes ,Rob.Because our government doesn't call them "anchor babies" they call them American citizens.HA!
Did you read this part-
The President opposes amnesty. He supports a rational middle ground between automatic citizenship for every illegal immigrant and mass deportations of people who have been living here for many years with jobs, families, and deep roots in our country.
I Love it!

2006-08-12 11:09:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Good.

2006-08-12 11:11:20 · answer #5 · answered by ***BORDER PATROL BROTHER*** 1 · 1 0

YES!

2006-08-12 11:03:54 · answer #6 · answered by sqwirl_hater 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers