I currently have cable tv and am thinking about switching to direct tv. want to get some peoples opinions about satellite vs cable.
2006-08-12 09:33:05 · 5 answers · asked by longboard_dood 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ TVs
Satellite may cost you more, but you get more for your money, A LOT more. The all-digital picture is much better, and if you get digital cable then you end up paying more and still getting less than with satellite. The only real issue is the weather issue other people talked about, but usually it only happens with really bad rain, and then it only lasts a few minutes, and with snow all you have to do is hose off your dish.
2006-08-13 14:17:22 · answer #1 · answered by mysticman44 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
On universal they are rather similar, you would possibly want to get whichever is the added effective deal for you. both provide the alternative to hook up more effective than one television, both provide HD, etc. Cable is particularly extra possibly to have outages using cable being by probability cut back or damaged using structure or injuries; satellite tv for pc now and again has outages at the same time as the elements is undesirable.
2016-11-30 00:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by zollicoffer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I had no TV for three years then I got Stare choice. What a pain in the @ss they are. Nothing but problems for me, and the storms and the snow ...anyway I have cable now and it rocks and I save 45.00 a month ....go for the cable... and I have the full cable package.
2006-08-12 12:32:39 · answer #3 · answered by Eonix 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have satellite. Let me tell you, it's not the best choice. We're switching to CableTV because every time there is a storm, it interupts the connecton with the satellite and there goes the movie I was watching.
2006-08-12 09:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by Romaneasca 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i guess it depends
what kind of programming
the price
features
at least cable wont go out in a storm
2006-08-12 09:40:47 · answer #5 · answered by ndnknowitall23 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋