Theists and Atheists, we need to have a world wide debating war. Isn't that better than a violent war?

Question

The only worry is that some God believers couldn't take losing and they might become violent

Theists may try to claim that it's a waste of time. WRONG. Brain exercise is not a waste of time


We need publized religious debates. Viewed by millions. We need to have them everyday.

Locations
1. Churches
2. temples
3. muslims mosks or whatever they are
4. Atheists conventions
5. schools
6. television
7. radio
THE THEISTS WOULD EVENTUALLY LOSE AND THIS WOULD BECOME AN ATHEIST PLANET

Answer 1

so you agree schools should be a forum of both sides of issues regarding evolution and creation and secualism and theism..... wonderful!!!

I have seen a number of Christian vs Aetheist debates

Anthony Flew the famous outspoken scholarly aethist in face was befriended by Gary Habermas of Liberty Baptist and was persuaded by the Intelligent Design arguments and becaime a theist

Answer 2

That would be great no one would ever have a hope of somethng better. If you had cancer what hope of a future life the rest will be suffering go kill your self.
Never think that justice will be done or good will triumph over evil.
Evil people rule and survivlal of the fittist.
At least it would bring about peace and stop war. Who would go fight if they thought this life was all there is. No virgins waiting in heaven when you die that s it. And for the majority of mankind it would be true. Luke say few will be saved and the rest you know the story "For dust you are and to dust you will return"
sometimes the Athesits make more sense and are probably closer to right then the Christians. I know they are then Muslims.

Answer 3

no, absolutely no longer. faith and rational communicate and human beings? thanks, that is no longer a functional mixture, it truly is a recipe for disaster. truly have a football or football tournament to confirm the question, that could have more effective likely have an excellent effect - and way more effective human beings will actual watch a activities tournament compared to an ethical debate. we would have a tournament each 4 years and the outcome will confirm if the subsequent 4 years will be atheistic or religious. which will be more effective effective than a debate and prepare to be very almost as rational.

Answer 4

Actually, I love debates. I usually win too. Hey, I have an idea. Go against Lee Strobel. Seriously! Look him up. He's awesome at this type of stuff.

Answer 5

Nonsense. "Faith" is not debatable. Theisist and atheists are not the problem. The problem today is with those who teach that anyone who doesn't think like them must die. War works in this situation. If all Islamo-fascists are dead, there is no jihad, and there will be peace in, at least, this arena.

Answer 6

I've seen athiests try to convince theists that there is no God... and I've seen the opposite. Nothing ever comes of it and they both have to agree to disagree. This debate you speak of would accomplish absolutely nothing.

Answer 7

Problem with this idea is that faith doesn't require evidence, in fact, it can ignore it. You cannot defeat faith with evidence and logic and reason.

And why should anyone try to convert anyone else? If someone wants to worship as a Christian/Jew/Buddhist/Jedi/Muslim, in the privacy of their own home or their place of worship, what's wrong with that?

Answer 8

No one would win. Alot of the "proof" on both sides just stem from philosophies and theories. If it makes people happy to believe then just leave them alone.

Answer 9

It would be a waste of time - because you can't change somebody's mind about religion. Or at least that's the way it seems.

Answer 10

Well the religious really would throw their toys out of the pram