Was Buddha right?

Question

According to Buddha [paraphrased], whe should, "Believe nothing just because a so-called wise person said it. Believe nothing just because a belief is generally held. Believe nothing just because it is said in ancient books. Believe nothing just because it is said to be of divine origin. Believe nothing just because someone else believes it. Believe only what you yourself test and judge to be true."

I think Bhudda is speaking religionists, non-religionists, and anti-religionists. Is he right, or should we fall mindlessly - and behaviorally - into the dogmatic belief systems of others?

Note that the question DOES go beyond religion. It's directed to "religionists, NON-religionists, and ANTI-religionists." Moreover, it is not an attack on any religion or belief system. It merely seems to be a wise philosophical perspective, and this without regard to its religious origin.

Answer 1

Thank you first of all for a good question - something different. I am sick of answering stupid single minded question.

Well what do you think - isn't it logical ? At least Buddha has the trust in you to believe that you are intelligent enough to analyse what ever by your self - he gives you a chance to show your intelligence ya? Better than getting someone to tell you do thid or u r screwed.

Of course I think that this verse is absolutle awesome and right ! I hope every one could follow this phrase.

One more to add - Buddha also said - one of my favorit quotes - that the mind is the cause for everything, when you think good it will always be like the shadow that never leaves you, but when you think and do bad - it comes behind you like the cart wheel behind the bull. Good one ya?

Answer 2

Yes, but this does not describe a scientific two-step process, per se (test>judge). Buddha spoke of an afterlife, and yet the existence of this afterlife cannot be tested - only the truth judged. It still will come down to faith.

Buddha did not encourage people to behave well so that they could enjoy a pleasant afterlife. Buddha encouraged people to seperate themselves from being OC about their comfort and material posessions so they could enjoy the life they were living more. By doing this, a person could attain paradise without having to die first.

Answer 3

Well your getting the picture wrong. Buddha was not trying to tell what to think, he was trying show people how to think, there is a very very big difference. Buddhism is more of a philosophy than a religion. The western style religions tell us what to think, and that is that, if you don't think this way then you will go to hell. That is that, it retards free thought. Some people just want other to do the thinking for them on this subject, with out taking responsiblity in their own hands.

Answer 4

Buddha vs fat Buddha i think of maximum everybody is acquainted with the two variations of Buddha, the thin and the fat one. the unique Buddhist photograph depicted is of him being skinny or of an subject-unfastened physique form. It rather has continuously afflicted me that especially interior the western international I’ve continuously considered the “fat” Buddha or “giggling Buddha.” the clarification why the fat version of Buddha is termed the giggling Buddha is using the fact interior the photos and statues depicted of him he's many times giggling or smiling. despite the fact that this giggling version of Buddha replaced into rather first presented in China. it extremely is as a results of fact in classic China, being obese signified reliable wellness and fortune. for this reason it made experience to create a picture of somebody so enlighten like Buddha to be obese and smiling. despite the fact that interior the chinese language Buddhist faith there's a monk by utilising the call of Budai who has been depicted as finding like the “fat buddha” so there could have been confusion in some factor in time. in case you bypass to India, Thailand, Korea or different international places interior the jap hemisphere you will discover that Buddha is depicted in statues and pictures as skinny, it extremely is how he replaced into considered initially.

Answer 5

I think he's hit the nail on the head. So many people blindly believe what their church tells them to believe. The church paraphrases the bible, with their own bias and bigotry, and people accept it as the true meaning.

When I came out as gay, I was an occasional church going Christian

It was hard at first, because on one hand, I had the church telling me I was wrong, and yet inside I knew it was something I couldn't change. I did, however, go to the church to try to change it. I prayed so hard to God that if he didn't want me to be gay, could he change it.

It didn't change.

And then, I started researching, looking at different people's points of view, and praying to God myself about the truth. And I found out, that in my heart, and through my understanding of God and the bible, there was nothing wrong with me being gay.

God made me that way, that's why he wouldn't change me.

So people, instead of just believing what you are told in church, look into it for yourself, and try to be open to what you learn. You might be surprised at how narrow minded a church can be.

Answer 6

Yes, Gautama Buddha was totally right.
He never actually wanted to be worshipped or followed.
He just wanted people to apply what he taught and see for themselves whether it was true or not.
If it's not true for YOU...it's not true.
And if it is true, it's still only true according to YOUR observation and experience of it.
What ever IT is!

Belief and opinion are not the same thing as knowledge and certainty gained from personal observation and experience.

Answer 7

Always knew Buddha ways a good teacher. A good teacher will ask YOU to find the proof of what you are being taught.

Answer 8

Those are good statements to consider no matter what religious belief one has. People should always draw their own personal conclusions from experience.

Answer 9

Some christians will definetetly answer no. Without considering Buddha...

Answer 10

But if you do that then all of the fanatical Christians and Atheist would have nothing left to do! And hobbies don't grow on trees!