WW III is already started.
It is the global war on terror. The current conflict in Lebanon is one of many fronts of the war.
2006-08-16 01:48:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by shredderb 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The chances are low, if anything, it might come close to the Yom Kippur War in 1973 when Israel routed an Arab coalition led by Egypt. If Iran tips in with a nuclear device, the stakes may be raised, but they're not due for an operational nuke until 2012.
The only time we can speak of a WWIII is when the strategic super-powers square off, until then, its just a side show among rump states.
2006-08-12 08:04:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Outside of fox news land no. all the principles in this conflict do not have the will or the muscle for a sustained war. all 1st world players are busy else where to get too mixed up in this one over dramatized skirmish. Israel can't stay beyond it's borders too long it learned that the last time it invaded lebanon. SYRIA AND HEZBOLLAH TALK TOUGH BUT DON'T HAVE THE STUFF. They are just annoyance who wants there prisoners back hence current events. So don't get all armagedeonish on everybody.
2006-08-12 05:53:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by brian L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think that this will lead to WW III.
Countries are already taking sides and will continue to.
On or before September 12, 2006 there will be nuclear war starting.
This will lead into WW III. In WWII Japan was starting to loose and then sent out there pilots with the instructions to use themselves as weapons. They were told that when they die they would become anything that they want to be.
Sound familiar? Today there are Martyrs. They are told that they get 70 virgins.
The answer will be the same to day as it was then. Nuclear War.
Hiroshima! then Euphrates now.
2006-08-15 15:39:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the suitable invention related to Iran became a selection of information reported as "1001nights". you look to stay with in that custom of telling fiction. Hezbollah all started this conflict under direct orders from Tehran. Hezbollah chief and command team concealed interior the Iranian embassy in the present day as hostilities began and remains there. Israeli infantrymen choose orange juice, at a similar time as Hezbollah is person-friendly for the fields of cannabis of their outdoor, and is the reason your tendency to work out issues that are no longer there. Israel now holds the bodies of numerous hundred hizbalons, yet Hezbollah reported basically fifty 3 deaths, possibly the rest weren't seen human by utilising Nasrallah. the hizbalonis made very stable use of Lebanese toddlers as protection from Israeli assaults, including loading toddlers on precise of autos donning rockets, and then whilst a number of those toddlers have been killed, the hizbalonis invited the press and ordered them to take pictures of bodies. i could remark on each and every situation you wrote besides the undeniable fact that it sounds like i'm coping with ****.
2016-11-04 10:43:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our international community and UN prevent worldwide wars, the violation of human rights, genocide, etc. and thus chances are slim to none.
2006-08-12 05:46:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by zillian.thrax 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
None...All those nations together can't fight Israel, so it will always be a local thing, Iran was at war against Iraq for ten years, so you get the picture
2006-08-12 05:46:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by class4 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
An answer by a must-see news clip:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html
2006-08-13 23:35:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by toon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not much of chance, no one cares that much about Lebanon.
2006-08-12 05:46:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
VERY UNLIKEY! in my opinion i think Iran or South Korea will start WWIII!
2006-08-12 21:22:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋