11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, ACCORDING TO THEIR VARIOUS KINDS." And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS and trees bearing fruit with seed in it ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS. And God saw that it was good... 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS, and every winged bird ACCORDING TO ITS KIND. And God saw that it was good…24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, EACH ACCORDING TO ITS KIND." And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS, the livestock ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS, and all the creatures that move along the ground ACCORDING TO THEIR KINDS. And God saw that it was good.
Pretty good job of answering the question millenia before it was asked!
2006-08-12 05:12:48 · 12 answers · asked by lizardmama 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry, I meant to say that Aetheists need not apply to this one. I fully understand that scripture is not proof if you don't accept scripture. It's just an observation for those who do. No harm no foul.
BTW, isn't it all those scientific minds who have failed to cure cancer? I don't believe that it's the top medical minds at the vatican who have been aggressively pursuing the vaccine.
2006-08-12 05:40:41 · update #1
My point is not the account of the whole story, but the 10 times it said "Each according to their kinds."
2006-08-12 05:46:35 · update #2
With big bang all but buried, and evolution loosing blood fast, I wonder what the next move will be. How preposterous can supposed scientific minds get. Science comes up with 'ID' as a possibility, and then they blame it on creationist. Then they come up with the 'string' to really complicate what they already do not understand. I guess that "I don't know" + "I don't know" = 2 no's="we don't know -that- we don't know"
2006-08-12 05:32:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I believe that you answered your own question by calling it the " creation story " That's all it was meant to be a story of how someone thousands of years ago thought the world was made.n Never mind the fact that other religions now known as mythologies ( Roman, Greek and Norse come to mind ) give a somewhat similar creation story of someone creating the earth, plants and animals out of nothing. Bible literalists go way too far with their interpretation of the bible.
2006-08-12 12:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by kucher1031 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You are assuming that the Bible's explanation must be right. Lots of groups have come up with different explanations. Millenia ago, there were other explanations too, but you're dismissing those as wrong without explanation. Also, people thought the Earth was flat back then. Does that mean we should forget what we know about the planet's shape.
2006-08-12 12:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by x 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
seriously though...you must be a literalist arent you.
You confuse the Holy Bible with your biology textbook again missy???
Why do I even bother...you'll never learn...
THE CREATION HAPPENED YES...PROOF IS IN THE UNIVERSE ITSELF...THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT HOW IT HAPPENED WAS EXACTLY AS THE BIBLE SAID BECAUSE IT IS NOT AND IT WILL NEVER BE A SCIENCE BOOK...STOP READING BY THE LINES LIKE THOSE FUNDIES AND INSTEAD LEARN THE MORAL LESSONS IT TEACHES!!!
2006-08-12 12:23:57 · answer #4 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
that is a good point. I believe that evolutionist are really using evolution to refute the fact that they are sinners just like the rest of us. The love their sin and they want to continue in it. Its easy to justify sex outside of marriage if we are made to be lower than the animals instead of lower than the angels. In evolution you can justify just about anything. With creationisim you can't do that.
2006-08-12 12:27:08 · answer #5 · answered by Monique B 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Looks like you are using circular logic. Creation says creation is true, so it is. It is because of people like you, that we have not cured cancer. You pull down the IQ of the human race.
2006-08-12 12:30:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
More circular logic from a christian? I don't believe it.
And where's that darn roll eyes emoticon?
2006-08-12 12:24:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Wow, you sure hit the nail on the head. But Evolutionists are blinded by their 'science'. It is sad, but there are some who could have God come down and talk to their face and they would still not believe. It use to bother me so bad, but now I realize, God tells us there are those who's hearts will be hardened. We just need to make sure we share His Creation, Love for us, and His Son with as many as we can. Thanks for sharing what HE has to say. :)
2006-08-12 12:20:01 · answer #8 · answered by Carrie 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
A story cannot debunk evidence.
Evidence can debunk a story.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
Ergo, creationism has been debunked.
2006-08-12 12:21:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hahahahaha... That is hardly proof.
2006-08-12 12:30:05 · answer #10 · answered by DontPanic 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋