---
---
They are not sacrificing, they are blackmailing and fooling the American people.
2006-08-14 21:30:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
They have not sarcraficed anyone. First of all, this is an all volunteer military that the US has. Second, there was faulty intelligence that led to this act. On that note, the President alone does not declare war. Congress was in complete agreement to go into Iraq. Third and most important, there was evidence of WMD's found. Perhaps you forgot to listen to that part of the news. There was a semi found and lots of paperwork. Just because we didn't find the vast majority of them doesn't meant that more didn't exist. They could still be buried in the thousands of miles of sand in that country and many were also sent across the border to Syria and maybe even Iran. The people of Iraq are happy we're there and very slowly, the country is being rebuilt. Don't ever forget that Saddam was a horrible man that killed his own people if they disagreed with him. He also had hoardes of money and palaces while his people lived poor.
Check your facts and ask the men and women actually serving in Iraq and protecting the US.
2006-08-12 08:00:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by HEartstrinGs 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iraq had, or still has them. Just because we did not find them doesn't mean someone or lots of people lied. We know, he has used them before, so how can you say he would try to use them on us. War Bites and no one likes it, but sometimes it is necessary. Some places in the world only know War. To say they were sacrifices for lies is completely absurd. Is this what you really want? The guys going to Iraq next, to read your rubbish. Anyone who thinks like you do needs to be more educated about this subject before you comment on it. Saddam hated the US and you don't think he would have jumped at the chance, to kill as many Americans as possible if he could. It is sad that Americans have to die for a peace keeping mission now. But don't you think that Iraq will be better off in the Future?
2006-08-12 05:26:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by tm 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush , Cheney and Rumsfeld did not lie about WMD in Iraq, if they lied, then your buddy, "Slick Willie" Clinton, hillary, Hanoi John Kerry and the rest of the UN and the world lied.
Suggest you and your friends back up and re-read the news prior to President Bush's re-election in 2004 and also prior to the 2000 election.
2006-08-12 05:34:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Give it up.
We went into Iraq for many other reasons other than WMDs.
1 Not living up to the peace treaty.
2 Firing on our planes.
3 For the years after the 1st war we have had no peace with Iraq,
We have been fighting Iraq all the time Bill was in office.
2006-08-12 05:15:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
When YOU sign up the join the military YOU sacrifice your life NO ONE ELSE!!! You sign your life away for your country and if you do it just because you had nothing else to do after high school then you did it for the wrong reason. Join ITT Tech and leave the Military alone. I am DAMN proud of my husband, my brother, my best friend, my uncle, my grandfather, and every other soldier out there defending our freedoms. If my brother died in action I would know he died doing something he loves, serving our country. There was no draft. Our sons, brothers, and fathers chose to serve and if they lost their life they did it for the most noble cause. Its people like you and Cindy that disgrace the names of those who have died. They did not serve and die for you to blame the commander of the country they swore to protect. Freedom isn't free and some pay the ultimate price. Do realize how many more people died every day in all the other wars? Many many many more but media has corrupted the views of many and changed the way we look at war. Don't criticize the president for the outcome of joining the service. They knew what they were getting themselves into and I hope they did it for the right reasons. God bless their souls. Remember God sacrificed his ONLY son for the world. We should all be grateful to those men and women who serve our country every day.
2006-08-12 05:25:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sarah J 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
i'm not sure what you study that lead you to have self assurance that Clinton theory that Iraq had WMDs. he's oft quoted as asserting, "one way or the different, we are desperate to disclaim Iraq the means to advance weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to grant them. it incredibly is our base line." Feb. 4, 1998. it incredibly is a assertion asserting that we gained't enable Iraq to advance those weapons, no longer that he has them. besides, in case you press maximum liberals to make sparkling what they actually think of exceeded off it relatively is uncommon to discover people who have self assurance that Bush knew that those weapons did no longer exist and intentionally lied to the yankee human beings. it incredibly is the inadequacy of our intelligence and the frenzy to discover somebody to blame for the detrimental assaults on 9/11 that complication human beings. The UN sent weapons inspectors and that they did no longer discover sufficient information to assist an attack. someplace interior the mess of the defense force paperwork it grow to be desperate that there have been WMD. this substantial information grow to be in all likelihood surpassed up the line (it incredibly is my opinion, some greater conspiratorial minds declare opposite directionality right here) and so Bush and Colin Powell legitimately believed that we did have information of those weapons.
2016-12-11 07:31:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was part of a plan by the neocons to rewrite the middle east. While Clinton was in office they were urging him to invade Iraq. In September of 2000 they issued a paper stating that: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." When 9/11 happened, they used the fear that generated to manipulate public support for an invasion. They have no intention of leaving.
2006-08-12 06:35:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr Ed Intelligence 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why do people keep saying that WMD's were never found? People are so ignorant. They only hear what they want to hear. And that is "Bush lied, people died."
WMD have been found in Iraq.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2004/0604/061704-wmd.htm
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/29062006/325/u-s-general-says-old-iraqi-wmd-found.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=13168
I could list more articles, but if these won't sway you, then nothing will, and you will continue to drink the Kool-Aid that you're being offered by the MSM and the looney-left.
2006-08-12 05:58:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes he missed led us on info about why we are there.But we are there and we can't cut and run.the enemy as experanced this cut in run in the 80's in lebenon when they blew up the the barrects.so if we leave now we send a message that if u cause the us soilders to die we will ,pull out and leave.other examples are somalia in the 90's.i say we over run iraq with more troops and end the fighting the right way.i think persomally we didn't take enough troops in there and now we are faced with what is happening today.i say send another 150,000 troops andsurround bagdad.and don't trust iraqi security for nothing.most of them run when **** hits the fan.and my cousin and uncle are there in iraq.
2006-08-12 05:13:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by chad262727 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Apparently they wernt the only ones to believe about the WMDs. Every intelligence agency in the world said Saddam had them. And Saddam believed it also. He used WMDs to kill hundreds of thousands of his own people. BTW, we have found some WMDs.
2006-08-12 05:07:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by lend322 4
·
3⤊
0⤋