Who exactly gets to decide whose sight is used for this? Bad idea. Too much power makes too many of the people who have it into bad people.
2006-08-11 20:47:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Canada isn't so unfastened. it somewhat is the enormous guy with the commercials who administration what the media is authorized to declare right here whilst it is composed of an excellent sort of subjects. we've a regulation that pronounces you need to stay right here for over 10 years earlier amassing canada pension at age sixty 5 which makes some experience, yet now there's a circulate to shrink that to 3 years. which means you may collect without contributing in actuality. those that decide directly to alter this basically decide on the votes from the folk of their section who out sort the white canadians now. And in case you verify out our canadians getting blown up in afghanistan you will see that theyare all white. additionally they usher in workers from mexico now whilst we've maximum of section time jobs now for our very own human beings, and the unions getting weaker and weaker consequently. united statesa. replaced into began by utilising a violent revolution yet which will not at all happen anymore once you have maximum of diverse nationalities turning out to be a super branch between the folk.
2016-09-29 04:39:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not thats stupid,supposing you were running to catch a subway train and u werecarrying a back paak and some trigger happy cop thought u looked dangerous and shot you!would that make u happy thats what happened to that Brazillian boy in London!!!!!!
2006-08-11 21:46:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris TM 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who would be the "god" who makes the decision as to who gets shot. Each individual policeman? You?
What do we do to rectify the "errors" made by this person?
I hope I don't live to see the day when we no longer even pretend to be a nation of laws.
2006-08-11 20:47:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i have mixed feelings about that. I think if it can be prooved that they r terrorist, thes yes. But at the same time I believe what comes around goes around. They will get what they deserve one day.
2006-08-13 12:23:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by butterfly 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because how would you know and prove that's what they were just by looking at them. Aside from which, that would be stooping to their level and proving in some twisted way exactly what they think about us anyway!
2006-08-11 20:48:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bratfeatures 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The trouble is the police keep shooting innocent civilians. Don't think it couldn't happen to you.
2006-08-12 08:17:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
uh no just exactly what does a terrorist look like and what ever happened to the constitution?
2006-08-11 20:48:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Daniel H 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, because you must prove the crime first... Police are not judge, jury, and excicutioner...
If you want them killed, that is fine, but you have to send them to trial first.
2006-08-11 20:45:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ozymandias 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO. If we did it would be like going back to the wild west.
2006-08-11 21:14:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by MUSHMAN 6
·
2⤊
0⤋