No but I believe we need Big Humungous Shields or even just an underground safe house just to be safe.
Don't you?
2006-08-11 20:25:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Earl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question has many layers
directly giving answer:NO
but what i think when i read this question is as follows
1.First thing i notice is that :
Do you think every country needs to increase its weapons?
because nuclear weapons is advance stage of weapons human kind is building right from stone age or before that and its definitely not the last stage
weapon as simple as knife is capable of killing people, so when someone says no nuclear weapons does that mean other weapons are permissible?
2.The reason why the question is asked WITH nuclear word is because of difference between previous weapon's destruction power with this one.
Its increased above the expectation of all (including makers of it)
3.The main problem is tendency of human to destruct
Everybody has this tendency, but at different level
Someone like Hitler was on the road of destruction of all earth without nuclear power and actually nuclear saved us from him
4.Knowledge can not be suppressed or unlearned
That's very important, probably more than what we think
5.Don't think that nuclear weapons is limit of mass destruction
There will be more and more destructive ways invented and someone that time might post question "Should weapons be restricted up to nuclear only?"
(When i read this answer again i find it unrelated to this question, but someone might find some use of it)
2006-08-13 05:22:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by gkd 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally don't believe nuclear weapons are the answer to anything. Once one country calls for a nuclear strike, every one will fall in line. The world as we know it will be very different. Countries survived just fine hundreds of years ago when we fought on foot with muskets. Nuclear weapons are a whole other level.
2006-08-11 20:18:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by . 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not, there are too many bad guys in every nation that are smart enough to use them against other nations, and start a world war, that would leave only the cockroaches and rats to represent the life on earth. It would be such a waste of life.
2006-08-11 20:22:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you got Bono, Geldof from ireland maybe nuke them
ooops, i'm Irish (a tiny country of 4 million)
How come almost every person on the planet knows who they are?
US has 5% of population of this earth - why is this an issue?
Bill Gates.....etc save lives
bush & his people NEED WAR to be elected
Its an idiot question?
JAW JAW NOT WAR WAR?
2006-08-11 20:39:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by rory_stokes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they need to all get rid of their nuclear weapons and if you think anything different you are stupid
2006-08-11 21:15:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by jerrycarter1984 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no...then we would end up with another Cold War, and there would be enough weapons to destroy the earth a thousand times...not good
2006-08-11 20:19:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
world war 4 is going to be fought with sticks and stones.
2006-08-11 20:20:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! All countries need to get rid of 'Nuclear' everything.
2006-08-11 20:20:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by 4mom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they need to increase their manpower
2006-08-12 02:53:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by HHH 6
·
0⤊
0⤋