English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

take a large chunck of ice and sit it in the middle of a table, and pull up a chair and watch it melt. this is like watching grass grow. get the idea, the thiner the ice the faster it will melt, are we loseing are ice cap? yes. is it because global warming, are is it nature reclaiming what has been hers all alone. i chose nature and all her wisdom because we all know nature has and will heal herself. any body remenber mt. st. helen, how the land looked after, now look at her now. NATURE WILL TAKE OF HERSELF.

2006-08-11 19:16:29 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

NATURE WILL TAKE CARE OF HERSELF?

2006-08-11 19:19:28 · update #1

has any body ever considered the thought that if something strong enough to wipe the planet clean of dinosaurs. you would think cavemen would be wiped out to. so would you not call this a mega natural disaster, and nature taking care of herself. if it happened then, it will happen again and all the recycling clean burning fuel want stop it.

2006-08-11 19:53:46 · update #2

11 answers

Yes, nature takes care of herself but that doesn't necessarily mean she'll take care of people. There were also a lot of living things that went extinct as a result of rapid climate change since the Ice Age. If the earth heated up to 150 degree surface temperatures on a regular basis I'm sure we'd be gone, but something else would still be around and the world would be taken over by scorpions and those weird lizards that bury themselves in the sand. ;)

BTW... Yes, that has been considered. When dinosaurs were killed off there were no cavemen around to be killed off with them. Again, nature took care of itself but it didn't take care of the dinosaurs because they were at the top of the food chain and the top always falls first when there's not enough resources to support it. Right now the top would be humans. Nature has no conscience when it comes to survival.

If an asteroid strikes the earth and kills us all, you're right that there's not much we can do about it, but global warming is something we might have an effect on but it would take a widescale effort and cooperation among governments to have any impact on it.

As far as alternative fuel is concerned, even if global warming turns out to be a farce, we are still headed for a fuel crisis somewhere down the line so it's worth investing the time and research in because when the well runs dry, we need to prepared for it. Oil is a non-renewable resource and the reality is we don't know when it's going to go or where to look next and we're so dependent on transportation that we'd be foolish not to do anything at all.

Thinking that everything that's ever been here in our lifetime will always be around is not how it works in reality. Much of it is beyond our control, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

2006-08-11 19:24:25 · answer #1 · answered by anonfuture 6 · 0 0

As we're going out of an ice age, the earth is becomming warmer for sure. It is proven that the average temperature was even higher during the dynosaurs era. It's a cycle.

If all the ice melt, more land will be underwater. That means more water will be heated by the sun, so more evaporation, so more clouds, so more rains, so less sun to heat the ground, so temperatures will start to go down, so....we're going back to an ice age.....remember, it's a cycle (even if it takes a lot of time)

As you're talking about mt st helen. another study showed that its explosion made the word colder by some degrees due to the quantity of dust in the atmosphere during the following years. That dust was stopping some of the heat from the sun.

2006-08-11 19:45:14 · answer #2 · answered by armirol 3 · 0 0

specific, we've been having worldwide warming by using fact the final Ice Age, and worldwide warming might actually save use from the subsequent Ice Age. maximum human beings do not understand that the oceans have risen one hundred meters interior the final 15,000 years, and that the fee of upward thrust will develop with worldwide Warming. that would not propose, regardless of if, that worldwide Warming isn't actual. If each and every of the fossil gas interior the Earth is burned interior right here few hundred years, it rather is going to advance greenhouse gases to tiers not seen for the previous few hundred million years. The final time greenhouse gasses have been so intense, Kansas replaced right into a shallow sea crammed with sizable swimming reptiles and Antarctica replaced right into a rain woodland. Having such an limitless replace happen over a pair hundred years would be an ecological (and financial) disaster. so some distance as "footing the invoice": a million) it rather is stupid to burn each and every of the fossil gas interior the international. substitute technologies are achieveable and could be mandatory faster or later. With the right political will, we are able to fulfill this technical project and save our civilization. 2) assembly the technical project could be a income rather than a detrement. it ought to be good for the financial gadget. 3) The longer this overhaul of our infrastructure is placed off, the costlier and unsightly that's going to be. the indoors maximum attack on Al Gore is uncalled for. what's mandatory is an entire replace of our ability industries. Attacking Al Gore for not individually reducing his carbon load is beside the factor. there replaced into in no way any severe talk of catastrophic worldwide cooling, different than interior the context of Nuclear iciness. that's additionally a actual consequence, yet no person ever argued it may happen and not utilising a considerable nuclear conflict or a considerable volcanic eruption. P.S. comments to the above: there are a number of archives, and that they are unequivocal to every person keen to learn what they propose. The CO2 tiers interior the ambience are truthfully increasing by using burning of fossil fuels. there is little doubt that an develop in worldwide CO2 tiers will bring about an internet worldwide warming. in case you do not agree, you're in simple terms incorrect. it rather is not a remember of opinion.

2016-10-01 23:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the trouble isn't that we are causing global warming, as much as we have prevented nature from entering what should be another cooling cycle.

Nature will indeed take care of herself. As the greenhouse gases build in the atmosphere, they initially retain the heat as the glass does in a greenhouse. But as the gases continue to thicken, they begin to act as a shield, and the solar rays will be reflected away from the planet, thus creating an ice age to end life as we know it.
Oh, happy day

2006-08-11 19:24:41 · answer #4 · answered by lowflyer1 5 · 0 0

Yes the earth has been warming since the last ice age, over a period of several thousand years. What we are concerned about is the very rapid increase in warming in the last 100 - 150 years, coupled with the measured increase in CO2 in the atmosphere in the same period. And yes, nature will take care of itself, but that doesn't mean it will take care of US.

2006-08-11 20:02:38 · answer #5 · answered by gp4rts 7 · 0 0

That or the earth will start to heat up and keep heating up untill life is forced to evolve into something totaly new that can survive in that heat. The earth could be turned into a spaceship and moved away from the sun to counter balance the effects of the warming but thats probably 2 or 3 years away in tech who knows if we have that long. ;) ;)

2006-08-11 19:26:06 · answer #6 · answered by magpiesmn 6 · 0 0

Did you realize that because of the melting of the ice caps that Africa sinks approximately an inch underwater a year? This is a very good issue you posted...I am torn however, not sure if it is more that nature is taking a stand, or more that we are slowly destroying ourselves...

2006-08-11 19:24:32 · answer #7 · answered by PerfeclyImperfect 3 · 0 0

I swear sometimes you have to wonder if all of this is our fault or was it meant to happen. BUt then you get into the matter of fate and thats a whole new problem...

2006-08-11 19:24:38 · answer #8 · answered by nodreamsnomusic 3 · 0 0

Yes of course it will. And what does it matter if most life dies out?
Incidentally i have no idea what you are saying, A little edit might be in order.

2006-08-11 19:22:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

global warming sucks!!!

2006-08-11 19:19:13 · answer #10 · answered by A*lee 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers