Do you like my Atheist Vs Believer story?

Question

An Atheist and a believer were having a discussion that had turned nasty. They were both to the point violence when God popped up to cover “his” believer’s back, just as Evolution showed up to protect its Atheist. The Universe, decided that it had enough stupidity for one night, it imploded and squished them all. The End.

Answer 1

I like it. Between two polar opposites is very often a truth. Unfortunately, fearful humans, atheist and Christian alike, really try too hard to achieve illusory certainty. They foist their views annoyingly upon the rest of us, because they hope, by convincing the dull-minded and uninitiated that there simplistic views are correct, to bolster their own beliefs. It is ironic that their attempts to convince us represent a fundamental lack of faith, contrary to their claims of unwavering belief.

Answer 2

The Lord can point you toward a life that is much more interesting, filled with excitement and joy and meaningful in ways that you cannot imagine.

You story is so lame that it is in itself an indication that you would benefit by such a life as I described. You should know the Lord and get a life that transcends writing sophmoric stories on Yahoo on a Friday night.

I say that in all kindness and care for you.

Seriously, pursue a more meaningful life -- aim a bit higher than you are now.

John 3:16

Answer 3

Since God is the Universe God wins, because God Remains.

That which HAS ALWAYS BEEN and WILL ALWAYS BE remains.

And God has promised an end to all things, except God of Course. God continues because like neutrons and electrons God aways was and always will be.

God is Eternal and so is the mass in the universe. God can create it and destory it.

But God remains.

Mass remains.

Answer 4

There are easy inconsistencies contained in the perspectives in regards to the character of non-perception among atheists ie Christopher Hitchens isn't somewhat a similar sort of atheist as Richard Dawkins. even nevertheless, those perspectives are constrained to the non-public point and not at all influence the final attitude of non-believers and does no longer quantity to what we'd routinely classify as 'contradictions'. As for the arguments outfitted based upon the medical technique, there are no contradictory arguments, in hassle-free terms incomplete theories. in accordance to observations, the religiously non secular are lots greater in all probability to tolerate and accommodate than choke another out of life. no longer because of the fact they prefer another, yet because of the fact they're in settlement with one yet another to a definite quantity and likewise because of the fact they have a situation-free enemy (the non-theists). they could in all probability dodge being faith particular of their attitude, opting to concentration on ie their collective humanitarian efforts worldwide, their contribution to the merchandising of ethical habit in society etc. so some distance, the atheist faction are waiting to place mutually a greater compelling case, springing up on marvelous in maximum all the open debates that I even have accompanied. yet i've got not got faith that that shows by utilising any means that our theistic pals are waiting to forsake their ideals every time quickly.

Answer 5

It's alright. But how did evolution show up? As a bunch of genetic chromosomes floating in the air?

Answer 6

I like it. The universe (part of nature) beats god. The atheist was right.

Answer 7

I have a better one. This world including the bible belongs to Satan. Goodness is fiction. Go out and prove me wrong, then you'll come back and tell me I was right.

Answer 8

thank u for 2 points

Answer 9

Ha Ha, very funny, so who was controlling the Universe?

Answer 10

Yup, the universe is really the "god" that does have final say for all of us. ; )