2006-08-11 16:57:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
because he is a f'n out of control cowboy who does what the F he wants when he wants to do it.
2006-08-11 17:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin H 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably because the WMDs he, Powell, and Rumsfeld swore up and down were all over the goddamn place weren't there. They found leftover useless shells from the Iran-Iraq conflict, but no "hundreds of gallons of anthrax". No giant caches of chemical or biological weapons. Those "mobile weapons labs"? Balloon inflators from Britain. Nuclear program? Israel done fcuked that up in 1981. Sorry, the initial justification for war was bullsh!t, and Bush finally grew a pair and admitted it.
2006-08-11 17:02:27 · answer #2 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They have recently found 500 sarin (sp?) gas containers but at the time we went to war we did not have concrete proof they were there.
I remember President Bush, in an address to the nation, giving MANY reasons we were going to war with Iraq. The liberals just focus on one....WMD's.
2006-08-12 03:10:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because since you have Conservative terrorist sympathizers (Conservatives have helped arm and train our enemies we have today) who gave WMD's to Saddam and forgot he used them all to kill hundreds of thousands of people.
Bush was also told by C.I.A director George Tenant and Richard Clark that Saddam had no WMD's. So Bush is lying (again) when he tries putting the blame on our C.I.A.
I guess blaming Bill Clinton is getting old
SUPPORT TERRORISM VOTE CONSERVATIVE!!!!
2006-08-11 17:07:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of direction. yet Saddam refused to abide with the aid of the words of the resign with the aid of dening get admission to to UN inspectors. What dems ward off conversing approximately is that Bush replaced into doing his interest, not taking any possibilities whilst it includes the protection of u . s . a ..
2016-10-01 23:31:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe he learned the meaning of the truth.
2006-08-11 17:03:01 · answer #6 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he actually was telling the truth for once.
2006-08-11 17:00:05 · answer #7 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he doesn't want to accept responsibility for his decisions. In other words, he's not responsible. Isn't THAT comforting? :)
2006-08-11 17:04:34 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cuz I'z my own werse enamy!
2006-08-11 16:59:57 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was enough at the time.
2006-08-11 17:01:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋