English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Virtually all nutrition labels say "based on a 2000 calorie a day diet". But I've been wondering is 2000 calories the proper amount for a person to consume? Or is it just a mathmatical average? Should people be eating more or less?
I'm a fairly active and athletic person, so I know that I'm naturally going to need more calories than most people, but still I wonder, how much is really enough.

2006-08-11 16:49:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diet & Fitness

10 answers

A proper caloric diet is based on the individuals needs and physical activity during a day. A sedentary person may only require 1200-1500 calories per day. An extremely active person may require 2000-3000 calories per day to maintain their body mass.

http://www.thefitnesspartner.com/howmanycals.htm

2006-08-11 16:52:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Calorie needs as you pointed out are based on physical activity, basal metabolic rate, and genes. The best way to figure out what you need is to write and track everything for atleast 7-14 days. At the end of that time add up the total calories and take an average. If you have eaten as normal and not gained or lost weight you have just found what is normal for you. To lose some weight shave off about 160 calories with every 10 lbs lost. To gain weight do the opposite. Your activity is also a factor so remember more or less than normal will effect your count.

You may use a calculator, but I find these also are rough estimates. Try www.calorieking.com or www.leanandstrong.com

2006-08-11 16:56:33 · answer #2 · answered by 35 and loving it! 3 · 0 0

For heaven's sake, you're in hassle-free terms sixteen! do no longer count sort energy, it is not going to get you everywhere. right here is what you need to do: - consume 3 balanced nutrition an afternoon or consume many small nutrition an afternoon (six to eight) - shop your nutrition as healthful as conceivable, 0.5 of your plate would desire to be vegetables and fruit - in hassle-free terms consume meat as quickly as an afternoon or much less of conceivable, substituting beans or comparable is mentioned - consume little or no processed meals - entire wheat bread and noodles supply marvelous skill (no longer Ramen) - dodge too lots salt - stay faraway from pointless supplementations and drugs, until eventually prescribed by utilising accepted practitioner - shop up the exercising, yet circulate forward and run exterior in nature if conceivable - Drink an excellent sort of water, consistently - Sleep a minimum of 9 hours an afternoon this could stability out your life, you will have greater skill and sense greater alert, you will age slower and don't must be counted on pills or drugs. that's fairly hassle-free and is going hand-in-hand with nature and the organic order of your physique. it is not all approximately dropping weight, you will desire to have a organic stability in all issues. you will have basically the marvelous quantity of each and every thing you decide on, and don't be tempted to stint on something basically because you opt to be thinner. i'm hoping this helps and you have a surprising life without the consistent concerns of weight-reduction plan and weightloss.

2016-09-29 04:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That depends on your sex, your build, and your activity. 2000 is too much for many people because they do not get much activity. For myself, I find a range of 1800-2200 does work well for me. I am a medium build female, and I consider myself active to highly active as I do at least an hour of exercise 4-7 times a week, plus a profession where I am on my feet and in motion for 8-12 hours 5+ days per week.

2006-08-11 16:58:33 · answer #4 · answered by Freddie 3 · 0 0

Depends on a lot of factors (height, age, ideal weight, desired body mass, metabalism, exersize routine, etc) so there is no magic. Younger people need more calories because they have higher metabolisms. Atheletes (especially swimmers and runners) need more because they burn more and need energy. You also need more calories if you are tring to add muscle or bulk up. If you are at the weight you want to be and have enough energy for exersize, then you are probably getting enough calories.

2006-08-11 16:56:40 · answer #5 · answered by HokiePaul 6 · 0 0

It is different for everyone. The labels all use what is considered the average calorie need for the "average" person (if there is such a thing). Your activity level, age and more should be taken into consideration.
Here is a calorie need calculator. It's on the Cancer org site, but it really is one of the better ones"
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_6_1x_Calorie_Calculator.asp
Good luck

2006-08-11 16:53:58 · answer #6 · answered by Goddess Kitty 3 · 0 0

From what I've read, 2000 calories is a total suitable for a relatively inactive person- if you're athletic you'll probably need a little more energy

2006-08-11 16:52:42 · answer #7 · answered by 4 · 0 0

It depends on your gender, your height, and your goal weight. Also if you're pregnant or breast feeding. I believe that for an "average" female, 1600-1800 would suffice, and allow for weight loss. As long as that's what you want. You should see a doc about it, and he/she could assess your situation. Maybe you should eat more, maybe less. It's all relative...

2006-08-11 16:56:46 · answer #8 · answered by Nikki 6 · 0 0

It depends on if your trying to gain or lose weight. My doctor told me 1200, for losing weight. So if your trying to gain weight(for wrestling for example) then it's ok.

It also depends on your body type.

2006-08-11 20:29:28 · answer #9 · answered by baby_bear042789 1 · 0 0

yah is about right


the less the better

2006-08-11 16:56:33 · answer #10 · answered by ONly truth 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers