Jesus is perfect, therefore he is obviously neither Dem, Rep or Ind.
2006-08-11 13:30:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He did say it is easier for a camel to walk thru the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, and we all know that the Republicans coddle the idle wealthy at the expense of honest working people. He did say that peacemakers are the blessed. What would that make the advocates of war? I do not think Jesus would be a Republican. He would be, and would feel quite welcome in the Democratic Party.
2006-08-11 13:26:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by jxt299 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
you pick: Jesus believed we could continually provide up our lives for others. Jesus believed the undesirable deserve our interest. Jesus believed anybody could be forgiven. Jesus believed abortion is an offense against the daddy's creation Jesus believed the death penalty isn't stunning. Jesus believed the prosperous could provide up their wealth. Jesus believed the government could take delivery of its due admire. regrettably, the Christian stunning in u . s . of america at present are denying a number of Christ's teachings and sell the thought to be Christ-like is to be Republican. the different end of the spectrum could be in basic terms as incorrect. Jesus does no longer be Democrat or Republican. Jesus is proper and neither D or R is proper. in basic terms so no one gets any humorous innovations... Jesus isn't eco-friendly social gathering the two. Jesus is King of Kings and Lord of Lords He does no longer vote. hahah... he Judges. Amen.
2016-11-04 09:54:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I enjoy your play on words!
However, Jesus didn't live in a democracy, and his followers say he's a king. If anything, Jesus is a monarch.
2006-08-11 13:26:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mrs. Pears 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus is King of a Theocracy.
No, he is not a Theocrat, but is his the King of the Kingdom.
2006-08-11 13:29:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by rangedog 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont' think Jesus really cares about our man-made gov'ts. He's got a much better one (or none at all, which, if God declared that, would be better than any kind of gov't).
2006-08-11 13:28:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by spongy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is not a member of a political party.
2006-08-11 13:25:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by MikeD 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I truly believe that if he were alive today, he would definitely have been partial to the Democrats....
2006-08-11 13:25:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Denise W 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No way man he was a republican. All good people are republican. Democrats support genocide, abortion, gay marriage and all those inhumane things.
2006-08-11 13:27:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by USA innovators of freedom 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! He was ridin' in high style at the time. that's how folk got around then, horses, donkeys, camels...
2006-08-11 13:29:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by blkrose65 5
·
0⤊
0⤋