I guess that both together would be the worse combination.
But what do you think is worse on its own a dick that is too short but with average (or above) thickness or one that is too skinny (a pencil) but have a nice length?
Please include what you consider to be too short and what you consider to be too skinny. (In inches please!)
10 points will be awarded.
2006-08-11 11:31:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Please remember to add what you consider to be too short or too skinny.
So when you say girth is more important (I have had no takers for length being most important yet). Remember to say what you think is too skinny or just what you think is a nice size of girth.
Feel free to add your length preferences or minimum requirements as well.
Please ladies only no Gays please.
2006-08-11 11:40:24 · update #1
Pencil is for sure the worst!!! If you can't even feel it, then it doesn't matter how long it is!!!!
2006-08-11 11:36:18 · answer #1 · answered by jiffypop88 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I've never really thought about in terms of measurements so I can;t help you there. I can tell you though that girth is more important than length because a woman typically can only feel so many inches (I believe they say it's 4) anyway.
2006-08-11 18:36:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
it is worse when it is too short because you dont get anything out of it pleasure wise. it is too short when it is 1 inch or 2 inches. a pencil dick, you can get some out of it but not alot. it is too skinny when it is 2 centimeters.
2006-08-11 18:38:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Girth is better than length.
2006-08-11 18:35:17 · answer #4 · answered by happygirl 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
i think an uncircumcised one is the worst one of all!
2006-08-11 18:35:37 · answer #5 · answered by lady sixx 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋