They are sentenced to death anyway, so maybe they should be sent to the high conflict zones and if they die then at least they died in combat?
2006-08-11 08:16:27 · 36 answers · asked by YouDon'tKnowMe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The military functions best as a team of disciplined, trained soldiers, not a bunch of individuals running wild with guns. Just throwing death row inmates into the mix would make things worse for the regular troops.
2006-08-11 08:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by Will 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Why give them any chance of freedom even if the result might be death in the line of duty. They gave up any chances of...if you believe in war...an honourable death. Why should they be trusted to fight for a country and it's people they betrayed by taking an innocent life, hence they are in prison on death row. That's where they should stay or until such time they are executed.
2006-08-11 08:24:33 · answer #2 · answered by minitheminx65 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of Obama isn't as sleepless as George W Bush. Bush sacrificed 30,000 civilians and four,000 militia workers in Iraq and Afghanistan..... " W Bush purely lost some dozen infantrymen in Iraq and Afghanistan....." Wow, ROFLMAO..... The Libya and Yemen wars weren't began by applying Obama ( as you are able to comprehend). And the sneaky Bush concealed the cost of the two wars to make his funds seem good on paper. once you're saying impeach Obama, you informed us plenty greater suitable than you bargained for - - which skill you have a small suggestions and don't comprehend jack what impeachment is all approximately. You mentioned various issues that made you appear to be an fool: .one million. That Bush purely lost some dozen infantrymen in Iraq and Afghanistan 2. which you would be able to impeach Obama without an impeachable offense 3. That we are dropping dozens of infantrymen in Libya and Yemen 4. That the taking of Osama bin encumbered's life value the lives of military Seals If I have been you, i might return to grade college and brush up on modern-day events. You failed in that area miserably.
2016-11-04 09:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give a murderer on death row Gun and drop him into a combat zone? What to keep them from joining the other side and shooting us up?
Not a good idea.
2006-08-11 08:20:51 · answer #4 · answered by akebhart 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great idea...give a death row inmate a machine gun and send him to another country and expect him to fight to protect a country that has already condemned him to death... I'm sure that'll save a few military dollars.
2006-08-11 08:22:03 · answer #5 · answered by markus 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Or just send Gitmo inmates cos they r closer to death and may be they know Iraq better since they are all Arabs.
2006-08-11 10:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by muzyne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, b/c inmates on death row do not deserve to die an honorable death.
2006-08-11 08:18:50 · answer #7 · answered by Spectre 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think giving convicted killers, who are probably pissed of and mad at America and our legal system, guns and a license to kill will turn out good? Wouldn't you think that they would run and join the enemy or just plain run. You obviously have never served in the military.
2006-08-11 08:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by symphonee3383 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, death row inmates should be executed, (and not after 25 years of appeals). If you send criminals to Iraq, you could expect criminal behavior by them, (our military), further blemishing our reputation.
2006-08-11 08:24:13 · answer #9 · answered by archimedes_crew 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question is beyond ridiculous. Why would they agree to that? Who's supposed to babysit the dead men walking while in the field? I sure wouldn't want to be the instructor when they get to fire live rounds for the first time. The answer is clearly no.
2006-08-11 08:21:55 · answer #10 · answered by Big Brother 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋