Is a 3rd party win possible?

Question

In our country where it seems that only Democrats or Republicans win.....is there have a chance for a 3rd party candidate to succeed?

Many other countries, especially the Netherlands thrive on multi-party systems....

How can we show more diversity in our political system?

Answer 1

the 2 party system is seriously broken. There is way to much power and money in the hands of a few. Their only interest (both parties) seem to be more money more power and holding on at any cost.

The country no longer seems to be the first consideration

Answer 2

For national office, no.

History has shown that all American 3rd party presidential candidates have kept their third party together only by the force of their own personality. Ross Perot recently, but also Teddy Roosevelt ran in 1912 for the Bull Moose party.

The only way I think it could work is if there were a strong 3rd party from the far right and a strong 4th party from the far left running at the same time. We almost had that in 2000 with Bush, Gore, Buchanan, and Nader.

Answer 3

For a Congressional race, or other state/local races, then yes, because it's based on purely who gets the most votes. Which is why we've have third-party candidates as Governors, Assemblyman, Congressmen, etc.

For a presidential candidate, then not under the current electoral college system, because votes for most states are allocated all-or-nothing. But if the states changed to a pro-rate percentage system, it would be possible for no candidate to have a clear majority in the electoral college. Then the 12th Amendment kicks in and there is a remote possibility.

Answer 4

No they will never generate the money and most people are too lazy to read about the platforms of candidates. They just go along with the media or whatever they voted in the past. I think they should take off vote straight ticket off ballots.

Answer 5

using all-or-no longer some thing nature of the Electoral college, a third social gathering has rather a lot no probability of triumphing and valuable little probability of impacting the election for President. evaluate Perot's run, at the same time as he took 20% of the common vote and nevertheless did not get a unmarried electoral vote. they could be extra effective off staying in between the significant activities and dealing to impression the platform from interior to take care of their concerns. If a third social gathering particularly become serious, there's a thanks to do it. First, they could convey jointly jointly in a particularly small state it is already particularly pleasant to their pastimes. operating example, Christian Conservatives ought to pass to South Carolina or Environmentalists to Washington. a tremendous inflow of those communities right into a gently populated area ought to swing the administration of a unmarried state. taking off contained in the state legislatures, they could ultimately get a US representative or state huge officer (US Senator, governor, etc). If that officer then ran for President as a third social gathering, they likely would not win, yet ought to deny that state’s electoral votes. THAT action ought to make stronger the social gathering to nationwide prominence and positioned them in a position to project between the present significant activities.

Answer 6

Absolutely not. The system is set up that a third party would have to convince corporate bribers to give them money. Real political change is unwanted by corporations.

Answer 7

I agree I would LOVE to see a 3rd party win. But to tell you the truth. Its nearly impossible without a complete dismantlement of the Federal government. Due to Big Cooperations. esp. Big Oil. etc.

Answer 8

Don't support a specific political party. Vote for the best person to fill the office, according to what you believe and stand for. Study the real issues. Vote according to your conscience. If we all do it, there's a chance.

Answer 9

I am always hoping for a 4Th or 5Th party win. This 2 party system is killing our country.

Answer 10

i think the big two just have too much dominance historically to be defeated. you have to get some really big political names (not just the membership of the screen actor's guild) behind a third party, and a boat load of money will definitely not hurt.