Many have the facts of this story wrong. The Italians whispered some insluts to Zinedine Zidane, who proceeded to headbut Jesus to his death.
2006-08-11 06:39:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by truthyness 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually,
The pressure was put on by the jews, and had the romans not done what they asked they would be dead. It was a bad situation and romans are as much to blame as the jews for killing jesus. I also blame those that stood around and watched, all mankind killed jesus, thats why i dont understand this forgiveness thing. Just because he asked god to forgive us does not mean god did...ya know
2006-08-11 13:37:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Xae 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
How could anyone blame an Italian for anything? We're too charming!
Just kidding.
In all seriousness, though, I don't think anyone really "blames" the Jews, either. Jesus died willingly, on the cross, for our sins.
-S
2006-08-11 13:56:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by sarahcurlygirl 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
2000 years later does it really matter? Maybe promoting and living out Jesus' message of love an acceptance is more important than blaming people for something that happened 2000 years ago.
2006-08-11 13:39:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by rrhiannon99 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because blaming the Romans wouldn't give people the excuse they so desperately need to justify their murderous hatred of Jews.
2006-08-14 05:38:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by mo mosh 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right, but the NT, which most Xtians erroneously believe come from god, teaches clearly that the Jews killed Xrist and that is the original basis for anti-Semitism.
2006-08-11 13:37:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the italians didn't kill Jesus
jews r the killers of the prophets among all ages
When Moses left them, they forgot God & worshiped a golden pig that they made by their hands from the gold of the Ancient Egyptian poeple
by the way, Jews tried to kill Muhammed (PBUH) more than one time but they failed
2006-08-11 13:43:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kevin 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because you not supposed to be a hater.
"It has been believed heretofore in the world that there is one devil that presides over the hells; that he was created an angel of light; but having become rebellious he was cast down with his crew into hell. This belief has prevailed because the devil and satan, and also lucifer, are mentioned by name in the Word, and the Word in those places has been understood according to the sense of the letter. But by "devil" and "satan" there hell is meant, "devil" meaning the hell that is behind, where the worst dwell, who are called evil genii; and "satan" the hell that is in front, where the less wicked dwell, who are called evil spirits; and "lucifer" those that belong to Babel, or Babylon, who would extend their dominion even into heaven. That there is no one devil to whom the hells are subject is evident also from this, that all who are in the hells, like all who are in the heavens, are from the human race (see n. 311-317); and that those who have gone there from the beginning of creation to this time amount to myriads of myriads, and every one of them is a devil in accord with his opposition to the Divine while he lived in the world" (Heaven and Hell n. 544).
2006-08-11 13:38:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
of course, you are correct, but you can't expect an antisemetic society to blame the people who took in Paul, now can you? Paul was probably the first christian who was anti-semitic
2006-08-11 13:42:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is to destroy the faithful, not gentiles.
If you are a followers of Christ then you partake of the heritage of the Jews. To hate the Jews is to hate the heritage of Christ to hate the heritage of Christ is to hate Christ to hate Christ is to hate Christians.
You can not hate Christ and Christs followers if you blame the Romans!
2006-08-11 14:46:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Grandreal 6
·
0⤊
0⤋