wouldn't it be more logical for atheists and theistst to just admit that none of them have any proof that god exists and none that he doesn't exist? Meaning apathetic agnosticism. wouldn't keep the people from following "gods laws" like not killing....
2006-08-11 05:12:45 · 8 answers · asked by Obilee 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well, you don't have to search every square inch of the Universe to prove once and for all that there is no God; certain inherently contradictory things can be proven not to exist by mere logic alone. For example, I don't have to search the world over to know for a fact that there are no "square circles" or "married bachelors" -- it's logically impossible for them to exist!
In a similar way, I also know it's an inherent paradox for there to be an "infinitely merciful and compassionate" god who tortures people forever and ever....
2006-08-11 05:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is proof of Gods existence. This whole universe and people and atoms and the solar couldn't have just evolved. The bible is Gods word and cant be denied. try to refute it and do an in depth study and see for yourself. I know I have felt Gods presence in many revivals and special church services. God answers prayers and still does miracles. He can change a mean sinner into a born again Christian with a new attitude. If you haven't experienced God in a bible believing church, you cant speak about his existence or non existence.
2006-08-11 05:22:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have heard this question before. Anybody who has been to a congregation where the Presence of God is will disagree. Even if they were an atheist all there life. The Presence of God is unique and unlike any experience in the world. Find a church where there is reporting miraculous healings and the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Anyone who attends one of these types of services wil not leave saying there is no God.
2006-08-11 05:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by super saiyan 3 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course there's no way to really prove that God does, or doesn't exist, but then there's no way to really prove that you or I really exist either (we could just as well be figments of one another's imagination).
But I don't think people are wrong to choose one way or another to believe, we have to believe things that can't be proven, or we'd all be insane, we'd be a world full of paranoid schitzophrenics, and while I certainly don't agree with what everyone chooses to believe, I'll take that over a world full of paranoid schitzophrenics any day!
2006-08-11 05:27:42 · answer #4 · answered by daisyk 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Agnosticism is the refusal to choose! I don't have proof that there are no gods, but I CHOOSE to believe this, partly because of the lack of empirical evidence of gods, and partly because the non-empirical evidence for their existance is shaky at best.
2006-08-11 05:19:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What are you babbling about, tricky Jew? You cannot lead us from Jesus. We are wise to you, Jewboy. The Lord protects us from your Godless deceit.
2006-08-11 05:19:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Proof is called FAITH and a BELIEF is that there is a life after this !
2006-08-11 05:25:30 · answer #7 · answered by barcan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No- yes-- WHAT are you tryin got get to..KEEP IT SIMPLE
For
Us
SIMPLE FOLKS!
2006-08-11 05:17:10 · answer #8 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋