2006-08-10 23:35:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Other - Health
Makes it easier to insert the needle.
2006-08-10 23:39:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The medic prescribing the dose is obliged to stay with standard clinical options, in the different case they could be compromising their clinical criteria. besides the undeniable fact that this does be the question, if medics are certain to the Hippocratic oath, (the moral standard which runs alongside the lines of no longer doing something to deliberately undermine someones wellbeing), then they ought to no longer be providing a deadly injection! we do no longer have the shortcoming of existence penalty the following is Australia.
2016-11-24 19:52:32 · answer #2 · answered by melaine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the alcohol is absorbed through the skin. It gives the prisoner a little buzz which mellows him out a bit and makes him easier to control. I saw this on an education channel on cable TV
2006-08-10 23:47:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the board of health would shut the facility down for unhealthy practices, then where would all the other death row prisoners do if you can't put the down?
2006-08-10 23:52:07 · answer #4 · answered by Catherine 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is becuase of the stipulation that nobody who is unhealthy can be put to death.
Therefore, to ensure that the prisoner cannot claim that they were infected just prior to the insertion of the needle, they ensure that the needle is inserted on clean skin.
No excuses!!!
2006-08-10 23:45:17 · answer #5 · answered by skiparoouk 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it is a standard practice in the medical profession. if you saw someone give that injection then realized hey that is my healthcare provider and you just got a vaccination with an infection would you not wonder?????? did they swab and kill those nasty little surface germs or not???? and gee where did that infection come from???
2006-08-10 23:40:24 · answer #6 · answered by loreeliz 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
so they can better see the veins.if the swabbing is to prevent infection though,i think it is beside the point since the guy will be dead in a couple of minutes anyway.
2006-08-10 23:42:47 · answer #7 · answered by rich-k 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
on the off chance that if they are given a last minute stay of execution they do not by chance catch an infection, then go septic and die.
2006-08-10 23:41:36 · answer #8 · answered by SumoJoe 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If he gets ill the have to cancel the execution. No really that's it. A good lawyer will make that point.
2006-08-10 23:40:58 · answer #9 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋