this is for ckm1975...
see . . if the people of kashmir have a liking of pakistani government they would have not achieved 60 % turnout in the last held general elections. its very clear that the pakistani leaders want kashmir for them as it attracts a lot of tourists.so they encourage and train young people and give them a Bachelor Degree in terrorism. And all the terrorists camp in those areas
are funded by the pakistani goverment. Pakistan has no other work other than to create damage to indian people and indian property just to get kashmir. The real fact is that india is very much advanced compared to pakistan and pakistan has to do a lot of things to become like india. So why cant they solve their problems like poverty and unemployement rather than thinking of owning kashmir with them. the people of kashmir will never opt for pakistan where a dictator is a ruler. the general choice of any people is that they opt for democracy which says that any one can contest elections. India is a fast developing country and pakistan is jealous about india's development and so they give these kind of troubles. what is the reason for pakistan to help osama bin laden(he is in pakistan border)? just to give all sort of headaches to india. Remember u cannot even dream of competeing things with india.
let us think about the terrorits in kashmir .who are funding them?
for what purpose are they funding them?
the answer is pakistan ,to give troubles to india. who was the reason for kargil war. it was pakistan.
india should attack pakistan and if it happens pakistan will be erased from the world map. but india is a peace loving country and that will never happen.
2006-08-10 23:13:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by kanna 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
After All, India has been very descent to Pakis, we advanced to some of the provinces of pakistan during the two wars, but we were gentle people to give it back to pakistan. After all Pakistan is a country which is evolved just becuase of a religious feeling. Dont you think Pakistan cannot stop terrorism to a great extent , if they wanted? . Pakistan is not at all a threat to India.
Who said Paks have nuclear weapons?The nuclear test in Pokran was even detected as an earth quake in Australia but the one done by Pakks , I am sure that was fire crakers.India never invaded any countries for past 10,000 years but was invaded infact.If needed India can wipe out pakistan from the map within 24 hours. Beware you Pakkis.
2006-08-10 21:57:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Proud Indian 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. Pakistan does have a terror problem. But the leadership is working to eliminate those elements. But they are a developing country without as many resources which are needed. India and Pakistan need to work together to solve this problem. Pakistan has already shown it's willingness to help as we have seen with it's cooperation with US and the UK. Pakistan is making an effort.
Plus, this would be a war that cant be won. Both sides have nukes and if one side attacked I am sure the other might actually use those weapons.
So in this case diplomacy is the key. Both countries need to work out the issue with the Kashmir Providence, when that is done. more steps can be taken to ensure regional security.
But that is just my opinion.
2006-08-10 21:36:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jon H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mr. Monu singh, i ask u one thing: What is the response of india to UN resoultion passed 50 years back on Kashmir. UN said Kahmiris are free to choose, which of Pak or india they wanna choose, India did not do that coz they knew Kashmiris will opt for Pakistan. And what happended then they Occupied the Kahmir and what the hell thier 1 million army is doing thier, For u readers please Kashmir's whole polpualtion is about 10 m. and for every ten civlians there is an Army Man there. Shame on U india and its govt and many many of the ppl, like u.
Indian army is killing many innocent kashmiris there, rape and killing of inncocent has become a routine for indian army men then. So what do u think IS THIS NOT AN ACT OF TERRORISM, why dont india give them thier rights which UN have decided for them. What the hell 1 million army is doing there. Shame on U and ur country.
And what happended on 05 aug 2006 in Lahore (Pakistan) an official of Indian embassy was cught rend handed over some Imp security information and having maps of Pak Province BALOCHISTAN, where indian intelligence agency RAW is making a HELL, Later both of them were interogated and found links with RAW. So what would u say Mr Singh about this.
2006-08-10 21:48:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ckm1975 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No
Both sides are run by pragmatists that are trying to control very unstable radical elements among their own people.
Pakistan and India have now "matured" to the point that their nuclear weapons force them into a Mutually Assured Destruction diplomatic mold similar to that of the USSR and the USA during the Cold War. But civility and compromise can work for the subcontinent as well as it did for the Superpowers.
neither country want to redraw their borders, so relatively minor issues like the Saichen Glacier and Punjab and other issues need not result in total war.
A war neither side can truly win.
2006-08-10 21:39:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by aka DarthDad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is very clear that Pakistan is playing a double-game.They supports terrorists and supply weapons to them on one hand and to the outer world they pretend as if they are against terrorism.If India attacks Pak.,it will be a end to the terrorist threat in Asia,and Pak. army can never match the Indian army.Indian Agni,Prithivi missiles can bombard the entire pak. within a second. No problem if Pak. use nuke but........... it would be a fool to use knowing that the entire pak. will cease to exit within 5 minutes by the indian nuclear plutonium arsenals after using their nuke.
2006-08-11 04:57:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ragava 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should follow Israel, to fight terrorism, wherever the base of terrorism is, whether in Pakistan or in Bangladesh.
Otherwise, they would f*** India in the *** and we Indians would enjoy it.
2006-08-11 03:17:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Electric 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No . Not in the ongoing circumstances because Pakistan diminishing its global image, which will pay more to India than gain through war.
2006-08-12 20:09:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by watan yash 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a great deal of evidence that it replaced into not the government of Pakistan that replaced into in charge for this. some have faith that a mix of the CIA and Mossad pulled off this attack. the human beings who did this action have been notably experienced extra desirable than in simple terms an usual soldier. this could slot in with a CIA agent and or Mossad agent. additionally the USA has fired dozens of missle assaults into Pakistan that could additionally relate this attack with the aid of CIA/Mossad. possibly Bush feels that the USA could income if those 2 international locations went to conflict.
2016-10-01 22:40:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why only india ? All countries should fight for terrorism... Like in india, even in pakistan, there r so many innocent people.... so y kill all.. Indian army should go into pakistan, and destroy all terrorist camps and kill daud imbrahim and osama and other criminals....
2006-08-10 21:37:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Zombie.... 2
·
0⤊
0⤋