English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or should i get it cut shorter? Maybe shoulder length? Am I too old for long hair?

2006-08-10 15:50:30 · 51 answers · asked by Rachel Green 3 in Beauty & Style Hair

51 answers

I am 37 and have very long hair. You should have whatever kind of hair you feel comfortable with. You have earned the right to be yourself. Be happy. Peace.

2006-08-10 15:58:22 · answer #1 · answered by frogspeaceflower 4 · 2 1

Long Hair Old Woman

2016-11-01 01:45:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ok sweety, I honestly dont think it matters. Im 25 and have brown hair and ash blonde highlights and its medium length, does that mean that Im too old to have highlights in my hair. Its all up to you and what you want, and what makes you feel good inside. So if you like your hair long, leave it long. But if you want shorter hair like shoulder length or whatever then you should get it cut, but only if you want to. But I dont even think that 37 is too old. Maybe 47 or 57. But 37 ???? Well I donno but thats my personal opinion, like I said it all depends on you and how you want you hair. to look. Well regardless of age, which one do you like better when you look in the mirror? Julia with long hair, or Julia with short hair?

Hope I helped ♥ now plzz pick me as best answer, lol =)

2006-08-10 16:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by ms_ricanluv88 3 · 0 0

Good it all is dependent. I don't believe someone will have to need to cut their hair in spite of what others say however I do agree that having ultra long hair (past the shoulders) in some/many circumstances isn't this kind of good notion relating to older age. It commonly does appear good on you so maintain it. My mom just became forty nine today, she appears mighty for her age (no solar ever!) and her hair is lengthy. Nonetheless, I tell her that if she wants to hold the long hair to handle it, do it and colour it or let it go grey/white. The worst is if you find yourself older, and your hair is consistently in a "i do not care" bun or ponytail, when ur re-growth is consistently showing or when it is rediculously frizzy or un-tammed, lol. These are the only motives why people say historical ladies should now not have long hair; the vast majority of ladies over the age of 30 (maybe used to) make it appear bad by using not caring. Hope this helps and do not reduce ur locks if they're attractive!!!! :)

2016-08-09 10:59:37 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

I'll be 40 in a couple of weeks and my hair is fairly long, it was VERY long last year and I cut it to my shoulders last fall and kick myself in the tail for it. Sometimes I get aggravated with it, but no, NO I will not cut it again.
Long hair is a personal choice, I have always had hair shoulder length or longer, so short hair will never be chosen by me. But to each their own.

2006-08-10 16:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by Sheila 4 · 1 0

Personally I think that the older you get the shorter your hair should be. I think though that 37 is still quite young and long hair should look great on you. As long as it's properly styled you have no problem at all.

2006-08-10 15:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by Ash 6 · 0 1

Age is a state of mind. I say enjoy the length no because I think there will come a day when you will get it cut short. I think it's more important to find out if your hair style is flattering to you appearance now. You might be able to save the lenght, but get it shaped a little different. I think you are too young to be worrying about your hair being too long. Start to worry when you are 50!

2006-08-10 15:58:14 · answer #7 · answered by hairsnipper 3 · 1 1

you know my mom always had long pretty hair and would not cut it she is 50. About 2 years ago she took the plunge. She had it cut to a shoulder length layered cut with side swept bangs. It made her look hip and 10 years younger. She is so happy with it i doubt she ever grows it out again! good luck!

2006-08-17 06:34:44 · answer #8 · answered by Ryanne 2 · 0 0

good all of it relies. I do not feel anybody will have to need to reduce their hair irrespective of what others say however I do agree that having extremely lengthy hair (beyond the shoulders) in a few/many instances isn't this type of well thought with regards to older age. It commonly does seem well on you so hold it. My mother simply grew to become forty nine in these days, she appears effective for her age (no solar ever!) and her hair is lengthy. However, I inform her that if she desires to hold the lengthy hair to deal with it, do it and colour it or allow it cross gray/white. The worst is while you're older, and your hair is continuously in a "I do not care" bun or ponytail, while ur re-progress is continuously displaying or while it's rediculously frizzy or un-tammed, lol. These are the one explanations why men and women say ancient females will have to no longer have lengthy hair; nearly all of females over the age of 30 (might be used to) make it seem dangerous through no longer being concerned. wish this is helping and do not reduce ur locks if they're lovely!!!! :)

2016-08-21 00:05:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Of course not. But to stay updated, go to a salon and flip through some hair style mags and ask a stylist to update your do, simple hair cut and colour while keeping it long some layers or something can freshen up your look. Of course long hair is beautiful on older women, think Nicole Kidman, Janet Jackson or Goldie Hawn. Nothing wrong with long hair - except when your like in your 60's. Even some people in their 50's should opt for shorter hair, so enjoy it now while you can!

2006-08-10 15:57:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

It's all simply a matter of personal preference. I actually have short hair and guys such as it. And i prefer a man with short hair over a man with long hair because long hair tends to make guys look too girly.

2017-01-18 11:33:20 · answer #11 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers