English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

everyone is related and if that is true isn't everyone living in sin?

2006-08-10 14:52:52 · 34 answers · asked by MaRiaNa* 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

34 answers

No dear we are born into sin already not because of that but because adam sinned and desobayed God by eating the fuirt the God had told them both not to eat.

2006-08-10 15:02:17 · answer #1 · answered by Tom Sawyer 6 · 0 0

When Adam and Eve were created, they had perfect bodies. After sin entered the world, all human bodies started the road towards less and less perfection. Because of this, the genetic pool was not too far from perfect for a long time and the genetic problems of intermarrying with close relatives did not exist. As time went on, the chances of deformities and abnormalities from these types of unions started to increase. God did not make the laws against marrying close relatives until Mount Sinai where He gave the law to Moses. Until then, it was not wrong to marry a sister or half-sister.

Yes, we are all related, but so distantly that the gene pool is not as affected. God's laws only restrict marrying CLOSE relatives.

2006-08-10 15:05:43 · answer #2 · answered by Chalkbrd 5 · 0 0

Yes, God created adam and eve and they had children and there children had children and so forth that does mean we are all related. But what matters, we are all living in sin anyway.

2006-08-10 15:02:14 · answer #3 · answered by moon and starz 2 · 0 0

Hello.
I dont seem to understand why people are so dumb, not that you are but the people who cant come to simple logic really sick what religion is.
Why whould any one tell you, that you are a generation of jesus?
What is that?
Read matthew 1:1 it tells that jesus is the son of davids, this means he was a futher generation from the great king david, yet he was never joesphs son, son that would be a lie.
Joesph was a direct grand son from david, yet mary was a virgin.
And god was the childs father supposdly.
Now the thing with that is in ISaiah it says, He will be the offerspirng and the root of all david.
A root grows a tree just to remind all the people who take there time to read this.
Futher more, this would mean jesus is not the son of david like it says.
That is realy nothing.
This has to do with your question, now instead of the lies that people wish to make you believe.
Adam and eve could have never been the only too people on the earth.
Why?
Becuase of gentic deformation with in ones sames genes.
We know if some one gives has there fathers baby that baby will, normally not make it out of the womb alive.
Some of them are born so treamdously inadauite for life its amazing.
This would make god dumb, if he were to put two people and expect millions.
Did you know this also happened after noahs ark!!!!!
The animals went in two by two...
No body survied the flood!!!
Lest i remind you all.
Yet now we have all these creatures with only two of a kind, the deformietes would be so great it's that we would have nothing that we have now.
Remember god is not dumb.
Heres the one i love to throw out to people.
The creation :( :(
In the beganing god created the heavens and the earth.....?
Now we see god making light on day one, he makes light and he spilts light from day.
making day and night.
NOW....
Four days go by...
God makes the stars and the sun and the moon....okay?
Can you not see where this has gone wrong. FIRST off...
The earth would have to exist before the sun, meaning no gravity.
On the fourth day god makes light and dark yet on the first day he also makes it....
I thought god wasnt dumb?
The thing is these books are just philosophies, and theories.
The bible contains over 37,000 verses not all of it is a lie, but i have made it a goal in life to show people there fatal errors, even when it does not come to the bible.~Spelling check is out so sorry for that~
Feel free to contact me if you want to know more!

2006-08-10 15:24:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes, everyone is related. No, everyone is not in sin. You speak if incest. It was not wrong then, there was no law and the gene pool was clean.

Research at the University of California- Berkeley in the mid 1980's confirmed that every living person on this planet came from one human woman. They took DNA samples from about 140 different cultures from around the world-results, everyone is related.

2006-08-10 15:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no, that doesn't mean everyone is living in sin.

when Cain married his sister, that wasn't incest, and wasn't sinful and wasn't wrong. God didn't declare til hundreds of years later that men weren't to marry immediate family.

Originally, when Adam's children married each other, there weren't mutations built up in the genes, so it wasn't harmful (the way it would be harmful today (and by the time God said not to do it, mutations had built up to the point it would have been harmful by then).

go here for more info:

http://www.answersingenesis.org

and do a search on their site for "Cain"
or "Cain's wife"

2006-08-10 14:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by Wayne A 5 · 1 0

You about got it, At least until Jesus Blood Sacrifice that paid for the Sins of the Believers, Sin is now forgivable with the Acceptance of Jesus as the Messiah The Anointed Son of God.

2006-08-10 15:01:22 · answer #7 · answered by kritikos43 5 · 0 0

Only if you believe That every 5th child born to a family is Chinese!

NO THE Adam was created 2000 years after the races of man were created.

6th day creation and the creation of THE Adam on the 8th day!

2006-08-10 15:37:37 · answer #8 · answered by Grandreal 6 · 0 0

So we're all related. And yes, we're all living in sin until we are saved through acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior. That is what is meant by the phrase original sin.

2006-08-10 14:59:46 · answer #9 · answered by WEIRDRELATIVES 5 · 0 0

Well.... That is certainly one way of looking at it. With research into the human genetic code it seems that all humans are descended from only one female. I'm more than a little fuzzy on the details but it was published a few years ago in American Scientific.

2006-08-10 15:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by mlwasp 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers