English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i asked why it was not o.k. to test god when it was o.k. in aincent times.
well 1st thessalonians 5:21 (kjv) it says to prove all things and hold fast to that which is true. in another version it says to test all things. well wouldn't god be considered part of all things? either he is part of all things or he is nothing.

2006-08-10 13:22:32 · 3 answers · asked by bgdadyp 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

you can't have it both ways.

2006-08-10 13:23:26 · update #1

3 answers

Testing things is different than testing God. "Do not test the Lord your God", that's good enough for me. I do enough unintentionally to tick Him off, not gonna do it on purpose.

2006-08-10 13:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

test God all you wan't just don't argue with the answers he gives

2006-08-10 20:29:35 · answer #2 · answered by apex 2 · 0 1

wtf?

2006-08-10 20:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers