English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This iz the mathmatical proof of Holy Trinity. Now, u non-belevers
refute it.
0 = 0 + 0 + 0 + …
= (3 - 3) + (3 - 3) + (3 - 3) + …
= 3 - 3 + 3 - 3 + 3 - 3+ …
= 3 + (-3 + 3) + (-3 + 3) + (-3 + 3) + …
= 3 + 0 + 0 + 0 + …
= 3

2006-08-10 12:59:15 · 51 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

51 answers

bizzaro refute! 3+3=6
3+3=6
3+3=6
bizzaro say u in league wit satan! rrrrh!
bizzaro not want to be yur honey no more!

2006-08-10 13:35:10 · answer #1 · answered by fatgirl2food 1 · 3 0

Try to follow this, if it's not too hard for you:
Take this portion on the the equation:
= 3 - 3 + 3 - 3 + 3 - 3+ …
see how there are 6 threes in here?

Now take a look at the following equation:
= 3 + (-3 + 3) + (-3 + 3) + (-3 + 3) + …
If you continue through this very same equation and the one before using the same number of threes, you'll find out (again, if it's not too hard for you) that there's an extra 3 here because you didn't follow through and didn't get to the (-3) that will add up to 0.

Any other number would do, too.

2006-08-10 13:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by Lizzyyyy 3 · 0 0

I hope you can count better then you can spell. You are in a boxing stance, are you going to beat me up tough guy? Anyway, what you are saying does not make any sense at all. Your belief system is a myth. Unfortunately a myth that is destroying the planet. Because idiots such as George Bush are making Merlin the Magician time prophesies come to pass. God does not have anything to do with this madness? Why don't you come up with a mathematical equation that brings us to a reality based belief system? Perhaps that could save us. That is how I refute the myth of the Holy Trinity. Now What?

2006-08-10 13:23:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The error in your math is when you went from
3 - 3 + 3 - 3 + 3 - 3... = 3 + (-3 +3) + (-3 +3) + (-3 +3)...
This is not a valid mathematical statement. You have magically pulled another 3 out of nowhere.

Think about it, and then try the same trick with another number say 8, Would that mean God isn't 3 persons but 8 instead?

By the way, I am a Christian.

2006-08-10 13:32:32 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 0 0

Alright I'm going to pretend you're serious.

You're trying to prove "mathematically" that 0=3? And yet you tacked on an extra "3" at line four to prove your point. When somewhere in the infinity of your equation (the "...") there is a -3 that will make that first 3 a 0.

And even if 0=3 what does that prove? That you're bad at math?

2006-08-10 13:15:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm really sorry to tell you this, but that PROVES nothing except that you can add and subtract.
Try this---
1= 1/2 + 1/2
1/2 expands becomes 1
1+1=1
parent + parent = child
1+1+1=3
Still nonsense but it fits better. At least I explained MY inconsistencies. Where'd you get that 3 in the fourth line (the first one that you added to all the others)? It is NOT present OR implied in the previous line.

2006-08-10 13:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by michael s 3 · 0 0

That proves nothing. Not only does it NOT prove the Holy Trinity to be true. It doesn't prove ANYTHING mathmatically. Nice try, though. In addition, this isn't a question.


Try this one out:

2+2=you're an idiot.

2006-08-10 13:13:33 · answer #7 · answered by kid_A 2 · 1 0

looks to me such as you went to Catholic college, yet slept with the aid of each and every thing yet recess. Your good judgment is batty, your Latin is atrocious, your English is painfully damaging, and you look sickly. i'm an agnostic, analyzing to be a Buddhist. i'm able to refute the Holy Trinity all day. Even discovered Christians can. It replaced into invented with the aid of the Catholic church. It replaced right into a factor of opposition sooner or later, and day after immediately, it replaced into VOTED in. that's a lot of hooey, created to salve egos and dissension between early church individuals. It helped to incorporate pagan religions into the church, by using fact there have been such a lot of at that factor. try analyzing.

2016-10-01 22:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

But.... (3-3) is NOT = 3-3+3-3...

And... look, even if we accept that 0 does in fact equal 3... how does that prove anything about the hyperstatic union?

2006-08-11 08:35:44 · answer #9 · answered by Tim W 1 · 0 0

I thought people stopped using acid years ago.Go back to your cell and sleep it off jail bird.You make anyone fanatical about any religion look bad.I still think that the other question was funnier.That one looked like you wrote it by eating alpha bits and sticking your finger down your throat.This one looks like someone needs to throw a net over you.It's a sure sign that somethings wrong when both of your sleeves tie behind the back.They're not just putting that on you because it looks good.

2006-08-10 14:27:45 · answer #10 · answered by joecseko 6 · 0 0

So ur proof that the holy trinity exists is the mathematical proof u are an idiot that can't count (the answer is 6 dumba*s)? Does that mean u think the holy trinity are idiots or they just create them?

2006-08-10 14:16:14 · answer #11 · answered by bobatemydog 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers