We have a 14 month old and my husband is ready for more, yesterday! :-) he is so excited to have tons of kids, but i want to make sure they are spaced enough that my oldest is old enough but not too old. how long did you wait? if you had to do it again, what would you do?
2006-08-10 11:43:23 · 14 answers · asked by msmayasmom 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
My children are almost 4 yrs apart... i didn't want to be changing more than 1 babies/toddler's diapers. This way, 1 was potty trained and pretty self sufficient at keeping himself occupied (playing with toys, puzzles, etc) so that if I had to be busy with the baby... they could amuse themselves for short periods of time.
2006-08-10 11:51:20 · answer #1 · answered by WenckeBrat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is not any "maximum suitable time" that applies to each physique. each and every kin is diverse, my young babies would be some year aside. We plan to attend some years and have a pair greater close mutually while you evaluate that's what we decide on and it will artwork for US. i be conscious of human beings who area them out 4 years so as that they won't have 2 in college on a similar time and that i've got a buddy with 4 young babies under 4. the two are chuffed and healthful families. You and your husband would be conscious of the marvelous time, do no longer enable comments and so referred to as regulations be sure the way you have a kin. in case you decide on yet another one, then it must be the marvelous time. whilst we'd have enjoyed yet another one, we desperate to enable it happen whilst it wanted to, I have been given pregnant the 1st month.
2016-09-29 03:32:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my oldest is 25. and the next one is 17 and the youngest is 15. I think i would have placed them about 2 years apart.
2006-08-10 12:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally don't have any kids, but I think two years is perfect. My sister and I are two years apart and we get along great. It is close enough so they can get along and relate, but not so close they have to be under each other's skin. It's also good so you can use hand me downs and save a lot of money. Have fun and congrats!
2006-08-10 11:51:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
we waited 2 years after our first and by the time she was born my other daughter was 3 and i am pregnant again and my second daughter will be one in a few days and she will be 19 months when this one is born
2006-08-10 11:50:11 · answer #5 · answered by beautiful 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My first one was 6 when i had my second and my second will be two on Sept 4th and i am due on Aug 28th..
I like the distance of my first two.. I am really worried about the two younger ones getting along and ect...
Gl to ya on what ever you decide.
2006-08-10 12:36:00 · answer #6 · answered by cenaldora 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I found out i was pregnent with my second one around my first ones first birthday. Its more fun to have them close together!
My friend has 8 months between her 2. They were both early!
2006-08-10 11:52:18 · answer #7 · answered by noone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my son was born jan 31 2000 and my daughter was born april 18 1997. they are almost 3 years apart and we wanted it that way and it is great
2006-08-10 11:51:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Britney Spears!
2006-08-10 11:49:28 · answer #9 · answered by Janet K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would wait at least a year before getting pregnant again that way your kids are going to play together... good luck
2006-08-10 13:28:21 · answer #10 · answered by wounderwoman44 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋