God the Science Master can do that, But I don't think they want two of my body, maybe two of my Spirit,
2006-08-10 10:49:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by kritikos43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on the use that the technology is put to. We're already genetically modifying viruses so that they can fight cancer. They are called retroviruses.
Now if one were to say clone a particularly virulent disease and introduce it into a municipal water supply, the result would be disastrous.
So the technology is not the problem. The use on the other hand, can be. Does that mean that we stop research on the technology? Only christians would be that stupid.
2006-08-10 17:50:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
for us, it wiLL give infertiLe coupLes a chance at a chiLd, and you couLd aLso cLone organs (note you do not have to cLone an entire person to cLone organs you can just cLone the organ you want so there wiLL be no need for organ harvesting)
reaLLy i cant see any bad coming from cLoning that doesn't aLready exist
2006-08-10 17:46:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can't see how duplicating a human would ever be a good thing. We'd be robbed of our individuality. It seems too likely cloned humans would be used more like machines. It would take humanity out of the human.
2006-08-10 17:46:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by couv 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
you realize that cloning would really be no different than being able to create an identical twin, right?
So far evil twins have not taken over the globe, so I'm not very worried about this.
2006-08-10 17:45:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
both.
itll allow us to help people with new organs and the like, we can advance technology further...especially medical technology.
but against because if the technology becomes easier to use i nthe future we could possibly be lookign at a real clone war....or something of the like.
2006-08-10 17:45:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by johnny_zondo 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The technology itself is neutral. Whether it works for or against us depends on how it is used.
2006-08-10 17:47:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by wiegraff13 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you're talking about somatic cell nuclear transfer, then it means men are unnecessary. females will be able to reproduce without us and we lose the evolutionary game.
how you perceive that - for us or against us - I can not say.
2006-08-10 17:48:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by crowell29a 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on whose hands this technology will be.
2006-08-10 17:44:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my opinion against us .
2006-08-10 17:45:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋