2006-08-10 08:30:27 · 33 answers · asked by Redbull 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
And have the fallout effect our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines in Iraq? Yeah, brilliant plan there!
2006-08-10 08:36:22 · answer #1 · answered by vbplr_12 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely no, The fallout from even a small tacit all Nuke would present a Major fallout problem, For many thousands of square miles around. EG Turky...Cypruss...not to mention Lebanon & Israel
2006-08-10 09:02:22 · answer #2 · answered by David 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you seen the news yesterday and today Israeli troops got there *** kicked by Hezbollah.
Times are a changing and Israel wants to try and Nuke Iran and Syria,but Israel won't do that because it's knows its going get it's *** kicked.
2006-08-10 08:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by Sherzade 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NOdo it the other way round. All the Israelis do is wail about how hard done by they are yet they are the 51st State of the USA and do very well out of the US. If they did not have the US behind them, they would not be so brave and assertive in the M/E.
In the current conflict, Israel is carrying out acts of open aggression backed by the USA. In other words the USA is bombing Lebanon using Iraeli plane and personnel.
2006-08-10 08:47:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuke their sites. Accidents happen all the while, specially in the hands of beginners. Maybe they will not touch the stuff for a long time then. Look what happened in Japan.
2006-08-10 12:28:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because the fallout will spread to the rest of the world, and then we will be screwed big time, I was like thinking more of the lines of Nuke'ing Iraq,Iran,Israleetc as they all start war's out there so the middle east wouldn't be missed at all,let them blow each other up, less chance of them bombing us, when they run out of arms they cannot target us!
2006-08-10 08:40:59 · answer #6 · answered by deano2806 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should nuke Iran's nuke sites for sure.
2006-08-10 09:39:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What nonsense! That view guarantees Mutually Assured Destruction and is why we have defective beings such as Bush and Blair in charge of our destiny. Stop reading the Rupert Murdoch press!
2006-08-10 09:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by Renewable 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think all the high politicians should sit around a poker table, and play it out. The winner's money goes to the country's poor. the rest of the players who fold ; leave the table and the war. Maaan, how peaceful life could be.
2006-08-10 08:57:49 · answer #9 · answered by bluebyou 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if they're prepared to be nuked back. Oh, and start world war three. But hey, why stop now?
2006-08-10 08:40:56 · answer #10 · answered by inquisitor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have thought this same thing many of times, it would eliminate the threght to us but also think of all the innocents that would be killed, people who want nothing other than a quick and painless end to the nonstop fighting and violence, the people who have families and relatives, no, nuking would not be good, but its a thought
2006-08-10 08:38:33 · answer #11 · answered by popeye 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋