I live in a small midwest town.My dog & I got out of my car at the city park. Leash was in my hand & dog was beside me. Animal control officer drove up and stated that my dog must be on a leash within city limits. I told him she wasn't running at large, she was walking beside me. He stated not running at large means she must be on a leash. I stated that I believed running at large means 'unsupervised'. Two days later I received a warning letter from city hall including the following definition of 'at large': " 'At large' means off the premises of the owner and not under the control of a competent person, restrained within a motor vehicle, or housed in a veterinary hospital or kennel". City Clerk stated that animal control officer could have issued a citatation requiring me to appear before a judge. I don't believe that I was in violation of the city ordinance.
2006-08-10 08:02:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets ➔ Dogs
Here, running at large is as the dog catcher told you..it is a pity, but many people would abuse the privilege of allowing dogs off-lead..especially not scooping their poop...as I walk with several dogs during the day..it is a hassle to have to always keep them leashed..even in safe, secluded places...Most of mine need leashed, but my one little girl is so reliable, i would like to have her just be able to walk with me.
2006-08-10 08:10:17 · answer #1 · answered by Chetco 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The law is an *** - is an old expression for a reason. The commenters here forget the law only works on paper. In the real world, leashes/ gates break, dogs pull free and owners fall over, especially on ice. Remember, the voice never breaks, but yes the owner must be vigorous. Idiot politicians, pressed by idiot voters/ owners make leash laws but since the leash removes real incentive to constantly train the dog, the leash actually CAUSES nastiness and antisocial behavior in dogs. You see such frustrated dogs all the time. They're the REAL danger.
The ONLY solution is training, socialization and exercise. Same for children. Why don't we put children on leashes? Society requires that children be socialized (in schools). And don't give us the guff about bad owners. Just take their dogs away or impose hefty fines if they can't / don't train them, same as we do for cars. Train and test dogs and their owners same as for cars and drivers. A whole industry is available for the purpose. Then BAN leashes or charge extra since obviously the dog (and owner) is not trained.
That's the only REAL solution. Why are we afraid of common sense and discipline. Can't do it? Can't have a dog on the streets.
2014-02-20 17:59:11 · answer #2 · answered by dvorakey 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This 'rule' or definition is required due to the fact that if a dog (that was not on a leash) decided to run over and attack another man's dog you would be powerless to stop him.
If the animal control officer tells you that your dog has to be on a leash, then it has to be on a leash. The city ordinance is worded the way it is to prevent an animal that is not controlled or restrained in some matter from causing harm to another person or their property (ie their pet).
Simple solution... keep your pet on the leash... you said you had the leash in your hand.. just clip it on the animal and others will be protected from an unexpected attack from your animal and you will be protected from a citation or worse, a lawsuit and having your animal 'put down'.
Hope this helps.
2006-08-10 08:15:11 · answer #3 · answered by wrkey 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
At Large Definition
2016-09-30 10:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does the law say?
"'At large' means off the premises of the owner and not under the control of a competent person, restrained within a motor vehicle, or housed in a veterinary hospital or kennel
Were you off the owner's premesis?
Was the dog under your immediate control? (Voice command doesn't qualify)
Was the dog restrained in a motor vehicle, hosued in a veterinary hospital, or kennel?
No? Then you were in violation.
They're called "leash laws" for a reason. Doesn't matter what you choose to interpret the law as - what matters is what the police and government interprets the law as.
2006-08-10 08:07:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Didnt you ever hear the phrase,"you cant fight city hall?" The law is what it is and not your interpetation of it. Under control means either behind a barrier or on a leash. You must understand that while I'm sure your dog is a little angel, not all are as well trained and it is for the public safety and the dog's that they have these rules.
2006-08-10 08:10:19 · answer #6 · answered by groomingdiva_pgh 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Most places have "leash laws" now. This means your dog must be on a leash unless it is on your property or in a designated off-leash area (such as a designated off-leash dog park). I believe the phrase in the warning "not under the control of a competent person" means not PHYSICALLY under the control, i.e. leashed, rather than not willing to follow commands.
2006-08-10 08:12:24 · answer #7 · answered by M L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who argue against the leash laws have never lost a loved one to a dog (which is a horrible death). Even a maiming is completely unnecessary and causes multiple operations to restore a victim's physical appearance and esteem. It is both selfish and childish to ignore the leash laws of your locality and jurisdiction. Sadly, some dogs are awesome and loving creatures that would never attack anyone, even if threatened. Still, by allowing the sweet ones to wander around off-leash, we are opening the door for the not-so-well-behaved dogs to run freely. This is a no-brainer. Last, if your dog bites anyone remotely related to me, I will personally sue you or pay to support a lawsuit by a friend or relative.
2015-08-10 02:58:40 · answer #8 · answered by Stuart Johnston 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi, I understand that you are looking for some advice or resources to help fully train your dog or fix behavior problems. If a professional dog trainer is not an option at this time, or if you want to trt training your dog on your own (a great way to bond), I'd suggest you https://biturl.im/aU0bJ
A friend recommened it to me a few years ago, and I was amazed how quickly it worked, which is why I recommend it to others. The dog training academy also has as an excellent home training course.
2016-05-31 06:29:20 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first thing you need to know is what kind of training you and your dog need. After that locate some good trainers that will take you and your dog, not just the dog. Learn how to train your dog https://tinyurl.im/FkKbD
In this special presentation you'll discover exactly why it's so important to start training your dog the right way. Important for you, important for your family, and, most of all, important for your dog! And It'll give you some great hints, tips, and advice to help you turn your dog into the best behaved, happiest, running, jumping, slipper-fetching best pal you always wanted.
These are the very same tips that I spent years perfecting, the very same tips that have worked for thousands of dog lovers just like you.
2016-04-15 00:34:39 · answer #10 · answered by Paula 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry but you are in violations of the city. At large means that is was off your property and off a leash. Most towns have a leash law and it requires all animals off the property must be leashed. But I understand where you are coming from
2006-08-10 08:09:18 · answer #11 · answered by cbutchee2000 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋