English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I totally agree, we should seal our southern border completally and not focus on the rest, because illegals would never cross through any of them. And besides don't all illegals come from Mexico, so we seal the southern border and no more illegals. I'm really worried about foreign terrorists, I mean look at that awful illegal that caused the oklahoma city bombin, or the unibomber, damn illegals.

2006-08-10 05:50:08 · 19 answers · asked by Fiesty Redhead 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

I was being sarcastic if anyone got it.

2006-08-10 06:05:25 · update #1

19 answers

Ahhh and what would that do???

The paradox is the terrorists come from Canada. But you are racially motivated to guard the US/Mexican border.

You would rather let Arab terrorists come in from Canada than have a guy just looking for a job come from Mexico.

Think about it. You have heart and soul problems. that concrete walls won't fix.

Go big Red Go

2006-08-10 06:09:56 · answer #1 · answered by 43 5 · 1 0

you may think of with each and every of the surveillance of telephone archives, IRS, Social protection administration, satellites, and so on, to not point out each and every of the police companies, Federal, State and native, it would not be very puzzling to be sure who the unlawful extraterrestrial beings are, the place they're residing, artwork, save, and so on. for sure there is no political will to unravel or avert or medical care this subject. we've the procedures. Heck, we had the procedures in 1945! do exactly what the different united states does and placed troops on the border. I don;t propose what we now call border administration brokers, I propose pass Camp Pendleton and Lackland AFB to the border and prepare our troops below stay situations. looks to me if we are able to deliver our troops around the international to guard different united states's borders, we ought to truthfully guard our very own against invasion. regardless of if, the place could we come across sufficient buses to deliver 30 million unlawful extraterrestrial beings to the border and stress Mexico to confess them? We in simple terms don;t have sufficient transportation. And what with regard to the gas expenses? it may fee $one thousand billion in basic terms for transportation, to not point out the expenses of kicking down doorways and rounding them up. yet it won't take place. Democrats want the votes and Republicans want the cheap hard artwork of an underclass.

2016-10-01 21:55:34 · answer #2 · answered by ammon 4 · 0 0

I wouldnt go that far. America is a free democracy made up of imigrants. To deny enrty to thousands of legal immigrants on the southern border would be wrong. However I do agree with you in the sense that wedo have a big problem on the border which needs to be fixed quick.

2006-08-10 05:54:55 · answer #3 · answered by stewcat123 1 · 2 0

So are you saying it's ok to have illegals here because the uni bomber and Timothy McVeigh were "homegrown terrorists" ???
That's a pretty weak argument !!
Just so you know, I want ALL our borders locked down !! The reason the southern border gets all of the attention is because that is where most of the problems (concerning illegal aliens) is coming from !! Those are the facts, you don't like it ? I really don't care....... Our southern border might as well have a welcome sign and Yes we are open to all ILLEGAL ALIENS !!! That is how easy it is to get thru the border!!

2006-08-10 05:59:19 · answer #4 · answered by Hold em Rox 6 · 2 2

i didn't think your examples were illegals , of course it would be ideal to seal the border but would be impossible unless you build a huge wall and have border patrol every 100 ft or so , just to big of an area to watch . unless they put a 40 foot electric fence around the entire border , that would be interesting

2006-08-10 05:55:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No, we offer refuge to alot of people that deserve it. I really don't care if we are all tan colored and speaking spanish in 50 years. And as for terrorism, ??? The Unabomber was not Mexican or illegal his name was Theodore J. Kaczynski, OCB was Timothy Mcveigh : an American and his buddy. What the heck are you talking about illegals?? 9/11 is the only example of a foriegn terrorist action I can think of and they weren't from Central America.

2006-08-10 06:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by t79a 5 · 2 2

sealing the southern border is going to lead to a situation someday where rockets are being fired over that border

2006-08-10 05:54:05 · answer #7 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 2 0

We should SECURE all borders and have internal tracking and enforcement. For example, when those 11 Egyptians on student visas didn't show up at their 'school' they were immediately all over it and caught at least one right away. That is the sort of follow up we need.

2006-08-10 06:18:05 · answer #8 · answered by DAR 7 · 3 0

you are so ignorant to the situation. the past does not dictate the future. you need to think about the situation in reality. if you don't know who is in our country, how do you know what there intentions are. we should seal all the borders. and let legal immigrants enter our country.

2006-08-10 05:59:39 · answer #9 · answered by wheniawoke 3 · 2 1

We should seal BOTH borders!!!!! Then we should start DEPORTING all ILLEGALS!!!!!!! I don't care how long they've lived here!!!! If you robbed a bank twenty years ago, are you not STILL a bank robber,even though you've evaded the law for twenty years????? Of course you are!! So, illegal is still ILLEGAL!!!! SHIP THEM HOME!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-10 05:57:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers