English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I watched some video and the white blurp looks like a way way smaller object, plus the engines are not even 'recovered' or photographed, wtf???

2006-08-10 02:24:46 · 26 answers · asked by bricabrac 3 in Politics & Government Military

dont ever call me dumb, ever, a bit a sarcasm from me to you.

2006-08-10 02:42:47 · update #1

first off, there is no video of a plane hitting the building, if you say there is back that up, or dont even post

2006-08-10 06:18:23 · update #2

first off, there is no video of a plane hitting the building, if you say there is back that up, or dont even post

2006-08-10 06:18:25 · update #3

26 answers

Yea this guy there was no 9/11 attack. He thinks that a missle hit the Pentagon.

2006-08-10 02:31:09 · answer #1 · answered by TJ 4 · 0 1

Why the glaring answer is because a airplane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11. in case you've been fortunate adequate to work out the info short in the previous it replaced into pulled, it can were glaring that no longer something wearing a megaton of gas rolled for the length of that immaculate backyard and into the Pentagon. there replaced into actually no longer something disturbed on the backyard and there replaced right into a huge completely round hollow contained in the area of the progression yet no airplane and no fireplace. As i have stated in the previous, if the morons operating this madhouse are not concerned some conspiracy, then they could end appearing like they're. FDR stated "no longer something in historic past occurs with the help of twist of destiny." And George Bernard Shaw wrote that "all large truths start up as blasphemies."

2016-11-23 19:09:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are distinct possibilities that it was a drone that hit the pentagon and not a plane the size they said.Its a very intriguing question.How did a plane the size of the alleged plane fly as low as it did ,and how come the plane made a sharp turn and just happened to hit the only part of the building that was virtually unoccupied due to remodeling.Where did the engines go,they were not recovered?Where is all the luggage and cargo of a passenger plane that size ?Where did it go? The fire wasn't that big after it hit to disintegrate it all. Lots of unanswered questions in my mind too.
Why cant people keep an open mind? Do you believe everything our government tells us,Bush lied about a lot of things,politicians lie.It is not so inconceivable to any person that has an open mind.Think outside the box once in awhile.

2006-08-10 02:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 1 1

Do I believe that an untrained pilot who couldn't even rent a two seater was able to pilot a jumbo jet out of the sky down to ground level then fly it over the lawn and into the side of the Pentagon? Of course, I'm sure it's very easy to fly Jumbo Jets.

What worries me is: -
1. The Pentagon could easily release videos to shut up conspiracy theorists like yourself, clear ones that show the planes approach. Then again, maybe they haven't put any cameras on the Pentagon's roof eh? Why bother?

2. Why wouldn't someone who really wanted to damage the Pentagon fly straight into the top of it? Wouldn't that be easier and do more damage? Silly terrorist, no need for the aerial acrobatics.

3. How does a Jumbo Jet disappear into a building? Perhaps the Pentagon is made of paper eh?

2006-08-10 02:49:44 · answer #4 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0 0

If it were a missile....Pentagon officials state the damage would not be anywhere near a severe, and maybe at worst 4-10 people might have died.......experts on this, say the speed in itself would have destroyed the plane to almost unrecognizable pieces.....The Pentagon is fortified, and only a plane going 550 mph could cause such damage......did it show you the debris of the plane outside? that was alot of wing, as well as other parts of the plane......and there were plane engine parts photographed in the building.....thought there were no large pieces anywhere, the engine pieces were among the largest......

2006-08-10 02:45:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Very old urban myth. Plenty of parts of plane and engines were recovered, and the Pentagon even released security footage which shows the plane hitting the building. Mind you, the recovered parts were small and mangled, as you can expect after the impact with a very solid builkding, and the following fire.

2006-08-10 02:30:46 · answer #6 · answered by Gungnir 5 · 3 0

Sigh... your question reminds me that we now have an entirely new generation "D" (for dumb) that was barely in the first grade 5 years ago and, at 7 years of age... you didn't have a clue of what was happening WHILE it was happening.

There are TONS of information about what happened on 9/11 but I'd almost bet you may know the buzz word "9/11" but you don't know what YEAR 9/11 happened.

Get over the conspiracy theories... if you persist in trying to find something everyone else has missed you will just bring loads of anger down on your very young head.

2006-08-10 02:30:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

That video is a blantive propaganda film supplied by conspiracies. Please search on here because before I have cited many of sources that confirm the pentagon was hit by a plane. Sorry I just don't feel like taking the time right now. Don't be easily fooled by conspiracies usually they are nothing more then doctored photos, misleading information, and unconfirmed reports.

2006-08-10 02:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by ESPforlife 2 · 2 0

Yes. Remember the plane in question had full tanks of jet fuel as it was slated to fly across country. Upon impact the engines were virtually disintegrated by the explosion on impact. The security cameras at the Pentagon recorded the planes impact.

2006-08-10 02:43:22 · answer #9 · answered by Add Man 4 · 0 1

I'm with you. Don't listen to these sheltered people who sit in some cube being fed lies by our government. The same government that stood in front of the US and stated there were WMD in Iraq. 6 months before they said that, they stated Iraq has no WMD. All they need to do is a little research instead of being so ignorant. I don't know what to believe about 9/11. To many weird coincidence's. To many unanswered questions. I love the lazy unpatriotic people who sit on the fat A**'s and think they know everything about everything. Fools. By the way no one can say crap, I served a year in Iraq.

2006-08-10 09:10:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, it certainly was - the tower were both brought down by aircraft strikes. An airliner was also crashed into the Pentagon, and another crashed into the ground out in W. PA after passengers tried to take the plane over from the terrorists. To think anything other is lunacy.

2006-08-10 02:31:46 · answer #11 · answered by Skypilot49 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers