latest terror threats - if only we'd listened to the protestors?

Question

if we hadnt joined america in this stupid and pretty pointless occupation of iraq we probably wouldnt be the target of fundamentalist terror cells (most recent being a plot to blow up 9 aircraft mid air), am i right? what do you think?

Answer 1

Actually your mistaken, As long as your not part of the fundementalist extreme Islam your fair game as a infidel and must be exterminated according to their doctorine....So with that said... remember that when you smiling to the fellas exiting prayers at the mosque and the guy next to you on the flight from london.-

Answer 2

Sorry, I think Blair, is a Knight of Maltha, a 33rd degree Free-Mason. A Illuminatis.

Nush is known as Knight of Eulogia, a Death Clan member, Lodge 322. He is a Illuminatis.

They manipulate events, and forge wars to make Peoples accept their Martial Law, and their New World Order.

Please, just think of it !

They are the Illuminatis, and they own you,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :

And this is what Bush’s minions had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Answer 3

I doubt it would have left us out of it, if we had stayed out of the conflict then maybe we would have not had any further action.

But at the end of the day we are a target either way, we would have supported the americans in some way even if it was not in soldiers, we would have publically agreed with what was happening then we would still be a target, that's what allies do.

The plans of terrorists are not that easilly laid to the side, there's no black and white in this, if they see an opportunity to attack they will take it, London is a metropolitan city, its a good place to strike the west.

If Britain truely disagrees with this war then why is Blair still in power, you have to listen to the masses and we have made our bed so now we must lie in it. There's no point in crying over spilt milk.

Just so that you know, I'm not pro-war, look at the poor Lebanese , what we face is nothing.

Answer 4

Your wrong..
Terrorist cells were around a long time before the US ever thought about going into Iraq.... Uss Cole ring a bell? Blowing up of Soldier Bases ring a bell?

I think that most European countries have gotten too soft in their approach to terrorism (with partial exception to the UK). I think most european countries are just opening their eyes to what a threat they have in the own homelands...

And.. Brits wern't the target with the 9 planes.. it was again Americans... most of those passengers would have been americans and they were after the US again.. the UK was just better at thwarting another 9-11.. and I am proud of them and grateful for that!

Answer 5

you're as stupid as your question is! It wouldn't matter if you joined us or not. They have been preparing for quite some time, and there would have been allot of Brits dead if they had succeeded. If we didn't have a conflict right now, then those terrorists would still do stuff to inflict fear and horror to the world. Another thing is they love the media attention they get cause it helps their cause. Just remember that those Arabs don't care about life like we do, and them killing all those innocent people would not bother them one bit. Think about the facts and the history of the people that are involved. Another thing, my grandmother once told me back when she was young back in WW2, allot of Americans did not want to get involved with it because it didnt affect them in the US. If they hadn't finally assisted England and the rest of Europe; well all i can say is that you would probably be speaking German right now. That is not why england is helping us, but because they want to make the world the safest they can for the future.

Answer 6

no even if we did listen to protesters there would have been even more terror attacks as the Islamic fundamentalist would have seen Great Britain as a week target and also the intelligence ageings wouldn't be as vigilant as if we went to war and plus most of the Islamic world support the occupation of Iraq. all the protesters are doing is making it harder of the service men and women's job a lot harder

Answer 7

You are wrong.
We would still be in Afghanistan, would you prefer we didn't go. Too scared of what might happen? Let them have their way and launch attacks when THEY please.
We should not be in Iraq. There is no reason for the occupation, and many reasons for us never to have gone. Now we are there we have a responsibility to the people - whether that means staying or leaving. It is the Americans who are making life more difficult there.
Not fighting because you know people will get hurt is commonsense, refusing to stop a fight because you might get hurt is not cowardice; it's stupidity, because it's counter-productive.

Answer 8

and people wonder why we will not embrace the muslim religion. They live here get a good education here, moan about how hard done to they are whilst living here, bring all their families and long lost relatives over here to live and scam money from the tax payer , take over our schools don't think so? My daughter went to a school in Derby where there were 30 white children the rest were asian but hey what the hell we are at fault for not being tolerant. Me personally i would not put any muslim in any type of responsilbe job. Where my mum l;ives in Lancashire they regularly send their boys to Afgahnistan to train with the bi laden lot. Some were arrested less than a quarter of a mile where my mum lives and their front, is a take away that no one seems to buy anything from, yet the council and police do nothing. Thier religion will always come out on top, we the english mean nothing to them, well except we give everything to them , like vast areas of britain to live in and do as they please , let them have as many mosques as they like, 8 miles from my mum are 29 mosques, thats Blackburn. We are not allowed into them nor do we know what is preached in there. but do we care , hell no, look at him with no arms living and preaching in this country, he was able to preach hatered on the streets of London, this country is pathetic. Look after the immigrants and sod us. I have lived in their communities in Derby and in Lancashire so I know what i am talking about, unlike the bleeding hearts who seem to think they should be welcome here. When this happens no muslim should be allowed off the planes that come in daily with hundreds of muslims hoping to start a wonderful rich life in this country. Thats typical English....IF ONLY !!!! I rest my case !!!!!!! HIndsight is wonderful

Answer 9

According to Tony Bliar, The fact that we are a terrorist target has nothing to do with foreign policy, despite what any would-be terrorists may claim. These people - for reasons unknown - are just using issues like Iraq as an excuse to commit acts of terror.
I wonder if he, himself actually believes that..?

Answer 10

Terrorists existed in the U.K preaching hatred against the WEST (which incase you weren't aware; includes the U.K) long before we "joined" America in the fight against terrorism. They didn't just get air-dropped into the U.S and England on Sept 11th and July 7th, in fact the majority of bombers involved in the London tube bombings were British nationals living in England. To think that they attacked those innocent people purely because WE "joned" America is absolutely ridiculous. They attacked because they are mentally imbalanced due to years of systematic brain washing. How ignorant to think that because one country goes to another's aid that they should become a target for terrorists solely due to this action. You people need to be educated in the subject of terrorism before you provide unresearched comments, as it is evident that you are somewhat lacking in intelligent input on the matter.