See what others are saying. Bet here on Boxing!http://www.try2bet.com/group_discussion.aspx?g=1
2006-08-09 23:58:07 · 10 answers · asked by Vicky L 3 in Sports ➔ Boxing
Vicki ~
I will have to go with Maskaev, reason being he already "Knocked-out" the "Rock" that being said, it's in Rahmans head the he can be beaten by the Maskaev and knocked out by him, Rahman has looked sloppy at best in his victories since his loss to Maskaev and he gets wild when he starts to get hit with solid shots.
2006-08-10 00:09:30 · answer #1 · answered by Santana D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rahman in 3
2006-08-10 07:02:36 · answer #2 · answered by Stylus Happenstance 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rahman
2006-08-10 07:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by TOMMY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, who cares???? The heavyweight division is such a mess. There is no good talent out there, and the tops guys aren't even fighting each other. Why don't they make it somewhat interesting and unify the top 3 belts?? I think it is appauling that they are showing that fight as a pay per view. Who would pay $50 for that crap? That's no way to get the public interested in the heavys again. Amazing, you can watch Taylor vs Wright on HBO but if you want to see Rhaman vs Maskaev you need to shell out $50. Stick to the welterweights, that's where all the action and talent is and they love fighting each other.
2006-08-10 13:47:22 · answer #4 · answered by gordongecko_1999 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that Maskaev will punish Rahman and TKO him in 8 rounds.
2006-08-10 08:02:24 · answer #5 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rahman is the last black heavy weight champ
2006-08-12 23:33:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
surely rahman
2006-08-10 07:00:56 · answer #7 · answered by sweet_n_salsa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey!!! Rahman !!! Rahman !!!
2006-08-10 07:03:50 · answer #8 · answered by Ryna Fonda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Maskaev will win by TKO although will be losing on the scorecards...... Maskeav wins TKO9
2006-08-10 12:15:19 · answer #9 · answered by rubentolon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DOH
2006-08-10 08:00:26 · answer #10 · answered by mahakjn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋