English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I asked that and many women said: 'but hair is a covering', so I showed them how hair is *not* the covering it speaks of, now none of them disagreed with that; they couldn't, it's written right there. However, most women turned around and said, literally: 'yes, but we don't need to do that any more'. So all in all, women think that men have to do everything it says, but women are immune? Go jump in a cow pat. That's why men don't go to church any more; all rules for men and only rights for women.

2006-08-09 22:12:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

*I guess thats just one more thing the Catholic Church is doing that is another long held ritual...women wearing the head scarf to show reverence while in the presence of God.

It is in scripture for men to NOT cover their head because Christ is his head and women TO cover their head in church because man is their head.

2006-08-09 22:15:37 · answer #1 · answered by Augustine 6 · 0 1

The veil covering that is referenced to in the bible is
" The veil of Christ " and the reason is that in Noah's day the Nefelium ( fallen Angels) found the women to be fair and beautiful and took women in marriage and had children called Giba part human part angelic also refered to as the giants in the bible, this was contrary to God's plan so he flooded the earth. Jesus said as it was in the days of Noah it will be again before the end time their fore women are to have the veil of Christ so as not to be seduced by the Nefelim.

2006-08-09 22:25:48 · answer #2 · answered by j p 1 · 0 0

Some women do wear head coverings. For these reasons and for tradition. But by the way in Corinth the church to whom the letter Corinthians was written had many ex pagan women Christians who had their head shaved and this was the reason for the seemingly double to the lesson.

2006-08-09 22:15:59 · answer #3 · answered by Debra M. Wishing Peace To All 7 · 0 0

No, this replaced right into a human invention, a sort of nifty little rules designed with the aid of a patriarchal church. The Bible quote is maximum probable taken out of context; the custom is probable borrowed from the Jewish yarmulke custom, and changed to easily handle women, and additionally could be a mirrored image of the modest gown of ladies, in historical instances and persevering with immediately, interior the area the place Christianity originated. regardless of if, it grew to become an illustration of know between Christians to maintain the female head coated in the time of mass. once you think of roughly it, too, there ought to be person-friendly hygenic motives for this, noticeably in historical instances whilst issues like lice have been a lot extra hardship-unfastened, and human beings needed to guard themselves and others whilst accrued in close quarters to worship. If something, the Bible verse probable refers extra to historical Hebrew cultural convention extra desirable than non secular doctrine.

2016-10-01 21:36:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I find it interesting that when a person refers to Biblical Law, a Christian will say it is unnecessary to follow it because, "That is only in the Old Testament."

You bring up a rule mentioned in the New Testament. What is their excuse now?

Essentially, they are admitting they have no interest in following the book they claim is inspired by GOD.

2006-08-09 22:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by HF 3 · 2 0

? I'll have to check on this one. I think it was meant for women who were speaking while a man was around,don't really know on this one. Time to read up on the bible. Thanks for giving me something to study on.

2006-08-09 22:24:04 · answer #6 · answered by GraycieLee 6 · 0 0

Never heard of that from the Bible ever (demanding that is).

2006-08-09 22:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by Brad 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers