50 atheists Re-post a Christians comments/question in Q form?
Do you notice this too?
2006-08-09 17:37:32 · 11 answers · asked by Nikki 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
example: http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=Ahnz2vRFQoU02_zmcr67HyQezKIX?show=AA10949179
2006-08-09 17:38:50 · update #1
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmxItQWO.HyTN3ih053kYyDsy6IX?qid=20060809212757AAYrRLK oops this one
2006-08-09 17:39:42 · update #2
is this to make some kind of point? based on one person's comments? i dont get it
2006-08-09 17:41:11 · update #3
De Lawd Cheesuz used that same technique by answering the Pharisees question with another question. Cheesuz was an atheist! You've reported me, eh? I'm gonna git yah!
2006-08-10 08:37:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Please check your calculator. Your figures are off slightly.
In the future, arrange your questions so that it does not appear as if you are being judgmental, in violation of Matthew 7:1.
The word "personality" is never properly explained. I saw a wonderful explanation lately in a book that I travel with all the time. It says"personality represents the dominant spirit within us." He then went on to give us a personality chart. Impatient person has a dominant impatient spirit; jealous person..etc. So if a Christian posts something, the dominant personality in an atheist must rise up in the person. Got the picture? Your job is to exhibit the traits of the Spirit within you and pray for their "Deliverance." Got the drift? It is called "Intercession."
Boaz.
Boaz
2006-08-09 17:48:37 · answer #2 · answered by Boaz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're greatly exagerrating, but nonetheless, it probably does happen more the way you say. I think the answer is almost obvious. Christians as a group ask a lot more stupid questions that deserve to be mocked.
2006-08-09 17:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by lenny 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
enable's assume that that's an exercising in ethical philosophy. That God sacrificed his "Son" for regardless of reason merits to be placed interior the area of immorality. one ought to state that that's not a probability by using fact God cannon be amoral. regardless of if, if in basic terms habit is the only criterion, then it would desire to be immoral. With this seize 22 subject the alternative is between an amoral God or the God whose habit is previous reproach. regardless of if, are morals and behaviour not interior the area of the fellow or woman? And is this not an anthropomorphization of God?
2016-10-01 21:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's how it is with all debatable questions.
Believe me, that's why the questioners post debatable questions in this forum, to start a debate. We wouldn't want to disappoint them now, would we?
2006-08-09 17:46:11 · answer #5 · answered by classyjazzcreations 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every activist has an equal and opposite reactionary.
2006-08-09 17:42:55 · answer #6 · answered by Don M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not take it as a compliment? We're interested in, and want to discuss, what you have to say. That's why we're here in the first place! =)
2006-08-09 17:42:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kids say the darnedest things! Sometimes you just gotta ask other people if they can believe it.
2006-08-09 17:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The are running out of ideas.
/
2006-08-09 17:46:26 · answer #9 · answered by Pashur 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It goes both ways.
2006-08-09 17:51:17 · answer #10 · answered by Aussie Chick 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋