lebanon & palestine
they are fighting israel the real terrorist
2006-08-09 18:56:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by arifin ceper 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most of the people are wrong on this post also....
Why do people that dont know whats going on answer these things....
The only people fighting against terrorism is:
US
Britan
Aussie's
France and a couple other countries were fighting but once they lost more then 5 people they backed out.
France for one is a bunch of cowards. We fought for them in WWII but they dont think this is a good enough reason to help us out....
SCREW THEM...COWARDS
2006-08-09 17:27:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by JB 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The more advanced countries just invent their own terror and then identify it where they want it to be, so they can then attack to achieve their agendas.
You cant fight terror it is an idea "the war on terror" is just buzz words to keep the sheeples happy at home and not thinking too much.
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9381
have a read get informed or just go back to the tv...most do anyway.
2006-08-09 17:26:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bearable 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The poster above, Bearable, is correct.
As long as sheeple idiots like the thread-starter is fooled into believing terrorism, the fight is fought by all.
Oh, and a message to the USArmy:
Raping and pillaging Iraqi people and villages isn't "fighting terror."
2006-08-09 18:51:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by acpropulsion 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
EXCELENT question!! This is going to the middle of our overseas coverage. At one time we were an isolationist usa. After the international Wars we became far extra lively and certain inerventionist contained in the affairs of others. a million. One reason is that of percieved chance. in the course of the chilly warfare we felt threatened , perhaps properly, with the aid of the U.S. whom also felt threatened by way persons. We made a tremendous variety of strategic strikes a lot of which (like our imposition of the Shah in Iran and our help of mujahideen in Afghanistan) have come back to hang-out us later. 2. yet another is economics. I doubt if we ought to nevertheless be in contact with the middle East if their significant export become cauliflower. 3. yet another excuse is a spread of snowball outcome. After a lengthy time period of injecting ourselves into the interior affairs of different usa-states , even if for good or ill, the final view that we've of our position contained in the international has replaced. ( i comprehend no longer for all of us). maximum persons alive immediately can't even shop in ideas a time after we were no longer going international enacting and implementing countless rules. 4. what's perhaps mandatory at this aspect is a standard rethinking of our overseas coverage and what it ought to correctly be universal. i'm no longer advocating one coverage or yet another (even in spite of the undeniable fact that I DO have an opinion) yet i'm affirming that we as a usa favor to imagine about this and communicate it because it no longer in hardship-free words impacts us in spite of the undeniable fact that the total international because of our economic and militia ability. We might want to re-evaluate because there are and performance been a tremendous variety of unintentional consequences to our moves an no longer less than we favor to confirm the thanks to be particular that our judgements of immediately do no longer chew us contained in the destiny. desire this solutions your question.
2016-11-29 19:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many people in the world would say that the Palestinian and Lebanese are involved in fighting terrorists. :)
2006-08-09 17:19:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
France
Germany
Israel
Australia
United Kingdom
Any developed nation which is the target of terror organizations.
Almost all countries have an anti-terrorism campaign. The but highly developed countries are more advanced.
2006-08-09 17:16:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Canada has lost over 20 men in Afghanistan.
2006-08-09 18:29:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not what the question should be!!
It should be, Who OTHER than the United States is WILLING to stand and fight this fight for FREEDOM!!
Jeremiah
2006-08-09 17:20:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeremiah 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If terrorist means somebody or organisation that terrifies or tries to terrify people, then I would like to know who you guys think fit this description. Then we can answer this question better.
2006-08-09 17:27:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by mutaali t 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Britain, France, Germany...just about all of them to some degree.
2006-08-09 17:20:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by sweetpea 4
·
0⤊
0⤋