I got hit in the face with a door! When I asked the guy why he didn’t hold the door open he said he was afraid I would get mad and think he was trying to dominate me. I could understand his fear, ridiculous as it may be. But I think letting the door hit someone in the face is ruder then holding it open. I don’t know who started this “you can’t hold the door open for me because I’m a woman” thing but I wish they would have considered the results of such thoughtlessness. How would you know a man is trying to dominate you unless you can read thoughts? Assuming all men think one way is called stereotyping! All men don’t think that way. I hold the door open for everyone, I think everyone else should to.
2006-08-09
10:45:30
·
7 answers
·
asked by
pinacoladasundae
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Etiquette
It's good to know there are still people with manners. Sometimes I feel different because I say please and thank you, and expect that people wont let doors hit me in the face just to be courteous. There are a lot of polite people out there. I just feel sometimes political correctness gets in the way of common sense.
2006-08-09
11:14:06 ·
update #1
By the way, Norskeyenta, I did not think it was nessassary to get into detail, but since you’ve decided to be so blunt I’m afraid I must. Let me make this clear. I was not expecting the door be held open for me. It looked as if he was holding it open for me. I was getting ready to walk through with a bundle of books in both hands; this was at the college I attend. I thought he was being polite. Then it seemed as if he hesitated and let go, right in my face. Then, after I hit the floor, his female friend helped me up, and asked if I was all right. I said I was fine, but thought that her friend was holding the door open for me. To which he explained that he was, but thought against it because he did not want me to think he was “dominating” me etc. PS. Norskeyenta, even if you dislike what someone has done there are more tactful ways of getting your message across, I was rather offended by your statements.
2006-08-09
16:15:42 ·
update #2