his public defender is saying that he most likely get 9-16 months and he has already served 6 and has yet to be arraigned. he has no prior record and the robbery was unarmed. he supposedly got away with 7 grand. i was just wondering how realistic is it for him to get 9-16 months considering this crime? it seems like too much of a lenient sentence for a crime like this. please answer if u have knowledge of the law and please serious answers only!
2006-08-09 09:57:37 · 8 answers · asked by radley1009 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
How many times are we going to have to see this question?
2006-08-09 10:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
9-16 seems way too lenient since bank robbery with or without a weapon is a federal felony.
2006-08-09 17:01:36 · answer #2 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is your friend Maurice Clarett?
But seriously, if he stole 7 large, he's gonna do some time. At least 2 years.
2006-08-09 17:01:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he is street savy, he probably plea bargined to a lesser crime that carried less weight. Or if he wasn't alone he could have tried to save his own hide.
2006-08-09 17:05:35 · answer #4 · answered by T-MANN 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
5 years minimum
2006-08-09 17:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by dt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he have not had court yet .3 to 5 years
2006-08-09 17:03:45 · answer #6 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Contect a attorny in that area ---------that is only help.
tell your friend to work hard and earn money then stilling ..........
2006-08-09 17:01:57 · answer #7 · answered by het 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THIS QUESTION AGAIN??? **** OFF
2006-08-09 17:15:08 · answer #8 · answered by bluepsyc09 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋