I met many war supporters back in 1969 and where did it get them? They got a losing war in 1975 just like Iraq will end up. A losing war. Get ready to eat crow war supporters.
2006-08-09 09:25:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I doubt it, America is a Super Power, we've got nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. We own the air when it comes to war, we've got the best of the best. I'm sure the war will be over within a decade, and America will be the winners.
2006-08-09 09:31:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as there is a state of war, they are winning. The idea isn't to spread peace, there is little profit in that and little political leverage. As long as we are at war they are making money and they use the fear that war brings to stay in power. That is why we entered Iraq without an exit strategy. Exiting is NOT part of the strategy. We are there to stay.
Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the current strategy can only possibly win when we kill 90% of the Muslim population. For every terrorist that we kill at least 10 civilians die. For every 10 civilians that die there will be at least 2 relatives/friends who are so angered that they become a terrorist. We can tell them it is the fault of Al Queda all we want. It makes no difference to them. They see us, a foreign occupying force, and they see their fellow countrymen dying to end the occupation. Telling them that the deaths are the fault of the insurgents is like shooting half the people in a room then saying "don't move and nobody will get hurt". We are basically creating more terrorists than we kill. This will perpetuate the fear which the madmen in control use to stay in power.
2006-08-09 16:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by Dr Ed Intelligence 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How come the anti-war supporters think they will win?
Next time when you come up with a question have some valid reasons as to why you think something. It goes over a lot better then using personal attacks for why your position is correct. It also makes you seem intelligent and knowledgeable about the situation instead of being biased.
By the way I was and continue to be for the removal of Saddam and believe it should have been done the first time. I don't necessarily agree with how it was accomplished the second time around.
2006-08-09 16:32:10 · answer #3 · answered by cmott84 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it weren't for anti-war activists and the media undermining the United States militaries ability to do their job what you said wouldn't be true. The fact is Liberals like you are responsible for the United States losing the war in Vietnam and unfortunately will cause Iraq to be much longer and more bloody than it would othewise be.
2006-08-09 23:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you meet any "war supporters" from the Revolutionary War? The Civil War? How about WWI or II? No one supports war. Sometimes it's tragic necessity.
2006-08-09 16:40:25 · answer #5 · answered by nilrak85 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll be having my crow nuked, thank you.
BTW, dog, - how'd you feel about those war supporters when you were serving?
I'm guessing you probably liked them a little better than you liked the sissified long haired hippies who were smoking the happy grass and calling you a baby killer.
2006-08-09 17:37:33 · answer #6 · answered by meathead76 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being in Iraq stinks (no violation there), but the meathead has a point.
How did you like the hippies back when you were serving?
2006-08-09 21:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by Professor Chaos386 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We will lose if left wing weenies like you had your druthers.Your side pressured us into leaving Vietnam and 2,100,000 South east Asians were slaughtered afterwards. We can only lose if we give up,nice policy.
2006-08-09 16:38:15 · answer #8 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did somebody catch you making the wobbly h in the head? Is that why you're so mad? Get over it. Play tetris or something.
2006-08-10 12:05:13 · answer #9 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋