I have seen several individuals ask Christians to prove the creation idea without using the Bible. There were quite a few responses from different people. I would like to respectfully pose the same question to the atheist community. What scientific facts do you have that you feel disprove creation? Please notice that I did not say disprove the Bible, but disprove creation. Can science truly disprove that there is a Designer behind life and all the things we see in the universe?
2006-08-09 07:31:41 · 6 answers · asked by Daniel L 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I would just like to add that I am not against science in any way, I love science. However, I do not see how looking at what we learn from science disproves that there is a Creator. I think credit is taken away from the Greatest Scientist by the claims the He doesn't exist.
2006-08-09 07:33:14 · update #1
OK so what is M theory. that didn't tell me anything.
2006-08-09 08:06:38 · update #2
dvlsadvoct -
do we not have the ability to reason? after you learn facts from science, can a person not come to a reasonable conclusion? Your statement just backed up exactly what I said. When it comes to the decision of whether or not to believe in God, some of us accept that idea, some don't. Science can only give us certain facts, it cannot prove that God does not exist. Atheists many times tell Christians that they want a sign, many Christians in turn say you should have faith. Faith as described in the Bible is not a blind thing, it is a belief based on solid evidence even though you have nothing you can physically see with your eyes. Science actually backs up our faith that there is a Creator because as we learn more it becomes even more unreasonable to think that something this complex and amazing could happen all by itself with no thought or reason behind it.
2006-08-09 08:15:25 · update #3
Yoda Green
Jesus Christ already did that. He is not just a fictional character from the Bible. Secular sources confirm his existence.
2006-08-09 08:16:56 · update #4
How can you guys keep saying there is no evidence to support creation? How can an unreasoning, unthinking force put something as complicated as a DNA strand together? If you reason on the matter, how does your mind come to the conclusion that it is possible for trillions upon trillions of chance happenings to come about all by themselves? If evolution accomplishes this through trial and error, how can it possibly know that one is right and the other is wrong if there is no thought process behind that? Yet, you keep asking for proof.
For Mieke - You only take away from the awesomness of what you truly are by saying you are a descendant of a monkey. As cool as animals are, you are on a much higher level than they are.
2006-08-09 08:23:22 · update #5
http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2004/6/22/article_02.htm
http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2000/1/22/article_02.htm
2006-08-09 08:29:15 · update #6
(2 Timothy 4:3-5) For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the healthful teaching ...and they will turn their ears away from the truth, whereas they will be turned aside to false stories. You, though, keep your senses in all things, suffer evil, do the work of an evangelizer, fully accomplish your ministry.
2006-08-10 00:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Creationism can't be proven, because it can't be tested.
Let me prove that:
What evidence, if it existed, would you accept as 100% proof that god didn't create the world?
If you can't provide an answer for that question, then there is no science behind creationism, since science attempts to seek evidence CONTRARY to a hypothesis. If you don't believe that such a thing can possible exist, then it's not science.
PS: science makes no claim regarding god, and you'd know that if you knew anything about science. It doesn't claim that god exists or doesn't exist. Science is neutral and silent on the "god" topic.
2006-08-09 14:37:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no evidence to disprove creation. However, there is also no evidence to prove it. There are simply more points in favour of evolution than creation. I'd much rather believe that i have a common ancestor with chimps than accept the belief that I was created on this supreme being's sixth day of work, thus also excepting the belief that a god that has supposedly existed since forever was too tired on his seventh day of work and had to rest.
2006-08-09 14:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by mieke 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't have to claim that god doesn't exist, since he doesn't.
There isn't a single, credible shred of evidence to support the existence of such a being. Not one.
The next person that provides such evidence will be the first to do so. In history.
But hey, if you have evidence, post it here, think of the fame and fortune, not to mention the churches that will be filled to capacity. And the collection plates! Oh! They'll be filled to capacity too!
Think of the vacations the con-men and charlatans at the pulpit can go on with your evidence that proves the existence of this magic sky-pixie!
We'll wait.
2006-08-09 14:38:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first all your proof is in one book if god or a creator made the universe why are the not hundreds of planets with life on them in our solar system why only one small planet .wouldn't you think if he did create the entire universe he would have billion upon billions of people worship him..he is a god and creator they do like to be worshiped...
2006-08-09 14:42:33 · answer #5 · answered by darkpony6262 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
M-theory does a nice job of doing away with the necessity of having a beginning to everything.
2006-08-09 14:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by 自由思想家 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋