NO! That wouldn't be good science.
2006-08-09 06:55:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by jmmevolve 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your question is about order and chaos. The better questionis this: can you break a wine glass with a musical note, take one of the random shards and then claim that it's perfectly designed, ideal in shape and form and that the chances of such a _perfect_ shard of glass forming by coincidence are only one in one million billion trillion?
Oh, wait... Evidently you can do that...
2006-08-09 07:01:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think there is any reason why not except that it is never observed. I think the equations that describe the splintering of the glass work in the opposite (time) direction too and so in theory it should be possible. However it is not observed and all science is based upon induction - making a leap about what is observed to a general rule.
2006-08-09 07:14:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Douglas M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you hit a pitcher inclusive of your fingernail it is going to 'ring' at a particular frequency, said as its 'organic' frequency. The frequency has to do with how the glass is made, how heavy it truly is, how thick it truly is, etc. that's actual slightly glass 'bell'. at the same time as that frequency is performed with the help of a speaker, or sung, the glass will vibrate alongside with it. that's termed 'sympathetic vibration'. you're able to do an similar ingredient with a guitar string. in case you play that similar word really loud on yet another device and then end all of surprising, you'll listen that guitar string vibrating, playing the word. that's type of like pushing someone on a swing. you should push on an similar 'frequency' the swing is swinging. you many times wait till it comes back each of ways and delivers the swing a push because it is going ahead. The swing also has a organic frequency. you should push at merely the right time. in case you merely pushed at random situations, the swing would not swing. Vibration works an similar way, with waves of air stress arriving merely on the right time to push the glass or guitar string, so the vibration contained in the glass or string receives superior and superior. at the same time as the glass vibrates strongly adequate it is going to spoil! I actually have under no circumstances considered anybody try this with merely their voice. it can take a large type of skill! They did it on Mythbusters with audio device. i assume it can be a probability to do it inclusive of your voice in case you've been loud adequate, and if the glass replaced into really skinny. that is why they use crystal glasses, because they're thinner and larger tender.
2016-11-23 17:51:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes glass is broken on a musical note - depending on if its filled or not. Reassemble will contain many musical notes some not so sweet.
2006-08-09 06:56:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by larry B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
you can break a wine gLass with a musicaL note but you can't fix it with a note
2006-08-09 06:54:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Resonance causes it to break when the frequency of your note equals the natural frequency of the wine glass. Instead of asking it it can be reassembled, why don't YOU try it?
2006-08-09 06:56:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, it is possible to break it, but you can not restore it with a different note, remember, basically the glass is a liquid, but its hardness dont alow to restore it just with vibrations.
2006-08-09 07:03:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by mfacio 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, obviously, but think about that. A beautiful clear true note can destroy a beautiful clear glass, but cannot repair it. Tells you something about the destructive power of beauty and truth.
2006-08-09 23:14:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by bubbacornflakes 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. The fractures in the glass cannot be re-fused by sound waves.
2006-08-09 06:57:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Babs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can break it with a note but you can't reassemble it with another note.
2006-08-09 06:53:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋