Have them come to a developed country, work for an individual, have clear job description and safety standards, and government controlled standards, and set period of time, so that they can return to home country with some savings. Their take home pay would be about half the minimum wage, or perhaps less. Its a win-win situation. They would be protected by all the same laws as anyone else, but they would be the personal property of the sponsor til the end of the contract.
2006-08-09 06:26:27 · 14 answers · asked by cbmaclean 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Seeing the conditions some people live in refugee camps in Africa, anything here would be an improvement.
2006-08-09 06:39:00 · update #1
I should have phrased it as an Opportunity, rather than using the term slavery. Canada has the "Live-in Caregiver Program". It offers jobs to people from overseas who want to work as domestics. They love it. It is just I dont have kids, so I can't "hire" a nanny. That is what I am talking about....Go ahead and add insults...you get your 2 points!
2006-08-09 07:01:44 · update #2
You're confused about the definition of slavery.
Not a bad idea, though - other countries do this and, for the most part, it is a win-win situation.
Never gonna happen in this country, however, as we're a democracy and the cry babies would never stop screaming their heads off about some nonsensical "problem" they see with it.
2006-08-09 06:32:40 · answer #1 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Interesting question and I might support it. Strange, white folks captured on the high seas and sold into slavery in North Africa came to like the conditions better than in England with its stiff and unbending social structure. I like the idea and think it just might have its place. When you're ready let me know as I have a few chores I need you to do....LOL
2006-08-09 06:58:36 · answer #2 · answered by Capt 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO, look at what the quasi-slavery of illegal aliens has done to ruin our economy and how it has trashed the American way of life.
Slaves would cost more than they are worth and the USA does not need slaves or illegal aliens period, it needs people who do their job as best they can for decent pay. Slaves would just undermine the economy and steal work from legal Americans...... just like illegal aliens are doing presently.
2006-08-09 06:33:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Apparently you aren't very clear as to what "Slavery" truly entails. You cannot "own" a person. Hiring domestics is one thing, sponsorship is yet another, owning someone is out of the question. I can't help but think you posted this question for shock value.
The thought of promoting and supporting slavery is outrageous!
2006-08-10 07:56:24 · answer #4 · answered by *~*~*~~~His Angel~~~*~*~* 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
who's taking funds from the undesirable and center classification and giving it to the prosperous it is your international? no person!!! Do you no longer desire the undesirable and center classification to have the flaws they desire? all of us desire products and centers fool! Why do no longer you bypass make you're very own bathroom paper considering the fact which you experience such as you're having your funds taken away for it! the perfect 50% earnings earners pay ninety seven.a million % of all taxes paid. Do the maths for the backside 50%! How plenty is extremely being taken from the "undesirable", no longer plenty it may look. Our "undesirable" have an more suitable usual of residing than the subject-unfastened individual in Socialist Euro international places, be careful what you like for....
2016-12-11 10:33:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be an idiot. Bring back slavery? What's the matter with you? Win-win situation? Get out of here. This is by far the most asinine question I've seen so far. Ridiculous. It's so stupid that I actually have to chuckle. Bonehead. I'm sure you mean (?) well. But really.
2006-08-09 06:34:36 · answer #6 · answered by El Teke 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your 'solution' sounds more like indentured servitude rather than slavery. And although indentured servitude was not as brutal as slavery, it's still a 19th Century concept that is no longer acceptable in todays world.
2006-08-09 06:33:28 · answer #7 · answered by baq2calli 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yea...great idea. Except that is serfdom not slavery. And anyone who remembers any hisory will tell you it doesn't work out too well for anyone involved. Except for the rich, lazy, frugal moron who brought them over...that would be you.
2006-08-09 06:55:50 · answer #8 · answered by thrty2mars 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's Names, for people like you, and there not "Pretty" either!!! And I'm a "White" female.......Who's very much questioning White Man's doings in this country, we all call the land of the "Free" ??????????
2006-08-09 06:56:14 · answer #9 · answered by Hmg♥Brd 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Assbag
2006-08-09 06:30:34 · answer #10 · answered by tallerfella 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋